Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air melalui Dewan Sengketa Tetap: Studi Kasus PLTA Asahan 3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.392Kata Kunci:
Dewan Sengketa Tetap, FIDIC, Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi, PLTA Asahan 3Abstrak
Defisit listrik di Sumatera Utara menghambat pertumbuhan ekonomi regional. PLTA Asahan 3, sebagai proyek strategis nasional, dibangun untuk mengatasi krisis ini. Namun, dalam pekerjaan kontrak Lot I Civil Works di proyek ini menghadapi kompleksitas yang berujung pada 25 klaim kontraktor dalam 20 bulan pertama. Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas DST dalam menyelesaikan sengketa konstruksi pada PLTA Asahan 3 pasca-amandemen kontrak. Studi kasus kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis ini mengkaji dinamika penyelesaian sengketa sebelum dan sesudah aktivasi DST. Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dan observasi, sedangkan data sekunder bersumber dari dokumen proyek dan literatur hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Engineer’s Determination tidak efektif, dengan hanya satu klaim yang terselesaikan sebelum amandemen. Amandemen Kontrak No. 1 mengaktifkan klausul DST sesuai General Conditions FIDIC Harmonised Edition 2010, menggantikan mekanisme Ad-hoc. Pasca-amandemen, DST yang beranggotakan ahli independen berhasil menerbitkan lima opini formal yang menyelesaikan seluruh klaim kontraktor. Keberhasilan ini didukung kompetensi anggota DST, pemahaman komprehensif mereka terhadap proyek, dan efisiensi prosedur. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa aktivasi DST merupakan langkah strategis yang meminimalisir eskalasi konflik. DST berkontribusi signifikan, efektif, dan efisien terhadap penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi pada PLTA Asahan 3, serta sejalan dengan UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 dan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2017.
Unduhan
Referensi
Aceris Law. (2022, January 2). FIDIC Dispute Resolution Mechanism. https://www.acerislaw.com/fidic-dispute-resolution-mechanism
Acharya, N. K., Lee, Y. D., & Im, H. M. (2006). Conflicting Factors in Construction Projects: Korean Perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(6), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610712364
Crisyanti, D., Nurlaily, N., & Seroja, T. D. (2023). Dynamics of Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Culinary Business Partnership Agreements. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.260
Dispute Resolution Board Foundation. (2024). Dispute Board FAQs. https://www.drb.org/db-faqs
FIDIC. (2005). Conditions of Contract for Construction (MDB Harmonised Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/node/530
FIDIC. (2006). Conditions of Contract for Construction (MDB Harmonised Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/node/494
FIDIC. (2008). Conditions of Contract for Design, Build and Operate Projects. International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/dbo-contract-1st-ed-2008-gold-book
FIDIC. (2010). Conditions of Contract for Construction (MDB Harmonised Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/construction-contract-mdb-harmonised-ed-version-3-june-2010-harmonised-red-book
FIDIC. (2017). Amendments to the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction (Second Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/construction-contract-2nd-ed-2017-red-book
FIDIC. (2017). Amendments to the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects (Second Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/epcturnkey-contract-2nd-ed-2017-silver-book
FIDIC. (2017). Amendments to the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build (Second Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/plant-and-design-build-contract-2nd-ed-2017-yellow-book
FIDIC. (2019). The FIDIC Golden Principles (First Edition). International Federation of Consulting Engineers. https://fidic.org/books/fidic-golden-principles-2019
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2022 Number 238, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6841). https://peraturan.go.id/id/perppu-no-2-tahun-2022
Hardjomuljadi, S. (2020). Fidic Golden Principles & Covid19 Guidance Memorandum. In Webinar on Dispute Avoidance and Resolution in Construction. DRBF & SCL Vietnam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV3gl4Dn6bQ
Hardjomuljadi, S. (2020). Use of Dispute Avoidance and Adjudication Boards. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000431
Huda, D. S. M., Wahyuni, D., & Parwanto, W. (2023). Proposal Wakai Secara Ex-Officio dan Implementasinya dalam Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016. Hunila: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan, 1(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v1i2.533
Indahwati, A. N., Sami’an, S., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2025). Arbitration in Resolving Construction Cost Claim Disputes Due to Time Extensions: A Study of Contract Law in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.388
Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Revision Edition). Mirra Buana Media.
Jaffar, N., Tharim, A. H. A., & Shuib, M. N. (2011). Factors of Conflict in Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Procedia Engineering, 20, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.156
JICA. (2012). Dispute Board Manual. Japan International Cooperation Agency. https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/english/our_work/types_of_assistance/oda_loans/oda_op_info/guide/c8h0vm0000aoeprl-att/db_manual2012.pdf
Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Yogeswaran, K. (1998). Significant Sources of Construction Claims. International Construction Law Review, 15(1), 144-160. https://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/70871
Kurniawan, F., Andaretna, L., Budianto, M., Septarianto, R., & Thalib, P. (2023). Transformation of Construction Contract Dispute Settlement Through Dispute Adjudication Board. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2022 (pp. 1-16). European Alliance for Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2342462
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 138, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3872). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/431
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2017 on Construction Service (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2017 Number 11, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6018). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1687
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2023 on Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation Into Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 41, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6856). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1825
Main Power Plant Construction Unit. (2021). Laporan Hasil Evaluasi: Perubahan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Dispute Dari Ad Hoc Dispute Board Menjadi Standing Dispute Board (Laporan Hasil Evaluasi Tim Kontrak, Pekerjaan Tambah Kurang dan Proposal Proyek Pembangkit Serta Fasilitas Pendukungnya Untuk Kontrak Konstruksi dan Konsultasi di Wilayah Kerja Operasi Konstruksi II). State Electricity Company (Persero).
Manalu, D. (2012). Turbin-Turbin PLTA di Sungai Asahan untuk Siapa? Mempertanyakan Manfaatnya bagi Masyarakat Sekitar Danau Toba. In B. A. Simanjuntak (Ed.), Konsepku Membangun Bangso Batak: Manusia, Agama, dan Budaya (pp. 3-27). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Murdaningsih, D. (2019, November 27). PLTA Asahan Kelar Dibangun 2023. Republika. Retrieved November 18, 2024, from https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/q1m9c4368/plta-asahan-kelar-dibangun-2023
Nippon Koei. (2023, May 17). Asahan No. III Hydroelectric Power Plant (HEPP) Construction Project. https://www.n-koei.id/project/asahan
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Sebastian, R. R., Wisatrioda, B., Sami’an, S., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2025). Resolving Construction Disputes through Negotiation: A Case Study of Amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment for an Electricity Infrastructure Project. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.389
Semple, C., Hartman, F. T., & Jergeas, G. (1994). Construction Claims and Disputes: Causes and Cost/Time Overruns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(4), 785-795. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1994)120:4(785)
Spassova, A. (2017). Dispute Boards: Wedding Rings or Marriage Chains? In IBA Europe-Caucasus-Asia (ECA) Forum (pp. 1-10). International Bar Association.
Svinhufvud, A. M. (2020). Dispute Board Determination and Recourse to Arbitration: How has the Link between Dispute Board Determination and Arbitration been Clarified in the 2017 FIDIC Conditions of Contract, and in ICC Practice? [Master Thesis, University of Helsinki]. The Open University. https://core.ac.uk/outputs/328854402
Tambunan, T. S. (2024). Peran Corporate Social Responsibility PT. Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (INALUM) Guna Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Provinsi Sumatera Utara. In Praktik Pembangunan: Paradigma dan Realitasnya dalam Konteks Sumatera Utara (pp. 47-71). Zahir Publishing.
Yanuar, R., Saputro, A., & Sami’an, S. (2025). Sustainability of Infrastructure Development in Indonesia: A Legal Analysis of Price Adjustments in Construction Contracts. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.385
