The Dialectics of Judicial Pardon as a Safety Valve in the Offense of Murder: A Substantive Justice Analysis under Law Number 1 of 2023
Abstract
The fundamental transformation of national criminal law through the promulgation of the New Penal Code promotes a paradigm of substantive justice that triggers a normative dialectic regarding the existence of the formal legality principle of colonial legacy. This study aims to critically analyze the position of judicial pardon as an exceptional veiligheidsklep instrument to accommodate legal facts in specific murder offenses, while simultaneously assessing its effectiveness in maintaining the balance between legal certainty and human rights protection. The research method employed is normative legal research with statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches analyzed qualitatively using deductive logic and the legal dialectic method. The results indicate that the limitative restrictions of judicial pardon in Article 70 section (2) of the New Penal Code clash diametrically with the mandate of Article 53 section (2) of the Law, which obligates judges to prioritize substantive justice over formal legal certainty. These findings affirm that judicial pardon functions as a final filter post-operationalization of the primary filter, in the form of conventional grounds for excluding punishment, such as weer-exces and overmacht. Through the analysis of Decision Number 4/Pid.B/2024/PN Jnp, it is proven that exceptional judicial pardon in murder offenses with a low degree of culpability constitutes a judicial necessity to realize the objectives of restorative justice and the decolonization of national criminal law. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that judicial pardon is an instrument for salvaging human dignity and requires the support of accountable sentencing guidelines. Therefore, the Supreme Court is advised to immediately establish a Regulation regulating qualitative parameters for the application of pardon in grave offenses to avoid sentencing disparities and ensure the moral legitimacy of the law in the future Indonesian criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Agista, C. D., & Adhari, A. (2022). Pembelaan Terpaksa sebagai Alasan Pembenar dalam Rangka Pembelaan Diri. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(10), 17023-17030. Retrieved from https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/12998
Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208
Alfianda, R., Risardi, M., Kamisan, K., Amin, M., Sarioda, S., Maulida, R., & Albayani, A. Z. (2024). Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi. Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i1.23
Arisandy, A. P., Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Karma, N. M. S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan karena Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Weer Exces). Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 5(3), 278-283. Retrieved from https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/juprehum/article/view/8065
Bahri, R. A. (2024). Penafsiran Asas Judicial Pardon dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru. Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Perspectives, 1(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.70837/m6wxns71
Baihaqi, I., Makarao, T., & Intihani, S. (2024). Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampai Batas (Weer Exces) Sebagai Alasan dalam Penghapusan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v6i1.162
Decision of the District Court of Jeneponto Number 4/Pid.B/2024/PN Jnp on Defendant: Ramli Dg Rani Bin Dg Tanga. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaef05c3748357429e20303735373330.html
Estiningtyas, A. R., Hasanah, U., & Windari, R. (2024). Comparison of the Legal Regulation of the Rechterlijk Pardon in Indonesia and the Netherlands. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 6(1), 54-75. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v6n1.p162-186
Eugenia, F., Limanto, C. J., & Tedjokusumo, D. D. (2024). Tantangan Praktis dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana: Kredibilitas Saksi dan Validitas Bukti Elektronik. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2), 492-503. Retrieved from https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/iuris/article/view/642
Farikhah, M. (2018a). Konsep Judicial Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) dalam Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0104.81-92
Farikhah, M. (2018b). Rekonseptualisasi Judicial Pardon dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dengan Sisitem Hukum Barat). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3), 556-588. Retrieved from https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol48/iss3/6
Fathan, R., Rivanie, S. S., Karim, M. S., Iskandar, I., Sriyana, S., & Halim, H. (2025). The Integration of the LPSK into the Criminal Justice System: The Urgency of Witness and Victim Protection Amidst an Illusion of Criminal Procedure Law Reform. SIGn Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v6i1.517
Filani, A. O., & Aina, S. A. (2022). The Place of Discharge and Recognizance in Criminal Justice Administration in Nigeria. International Journal of Law, 8(3), 55-59. Retrieved from https://www.lawjournals.org/archives/2022/vol8/issue3/8-3-14
Firmansyah, R. A., Widjaja, M., Kusumawardani, C. E., Sugianto, F., & Indradewi, A. A. (2025). Justice Collaborator at a Legal Crossroads: An Analysis of the Tension between Substantive Justice and Legal Certainty. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 368-384. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.479
Hakim, L. N., Andariesta, N. F. D., Sari, R. K., & Aziziyah, T. (2022). RKUHP: Judicial Pardon Concept in Corruption Crime. Legal Brief, 11(3), 1940-1950. Retrieved from https://www.legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/415
Hardicky, N., Rahmad, R. A., & Susanti, H. (2024). Policy Formulation of the Rechterlijk Pardon Concept (Judge’s Forgiveness) in Traffic Accident Criminal Cases. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2218-2228. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.683
Hasibuan, S. M. (2021). Kebijakan Formulasi Rechterlijke Pardon dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.2.111-122
Irwan, M., Rahman, A., & Amaliyah, A. (2025). Judicial Law-Finding in the Criminal Justice System: Harmonizing Legal Certainty and Substantive Justice. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.502
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Jatmiko, S. (2022). Rechterilijke Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) dalam Tindak Pidana Perpajakan. Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i1.6774
Kaudis, D. M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan dalam Keadaan Terpaksa untuk Membela Diri Menurut Pasal 49 KUHP dan Pasal 338 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 10(3), 142-150. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33128
Laia, F. F. D. (2024). Restorative Justice and Living Law Based on Dayak Ngaju Adat Law: A Comprehensive Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.363
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818
Manafe, V. A., & Sumanto, L. (2024). Asas Pemaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Quantum Juris: Jurnal Hukum Modern, 6(3), 338-349. Retrieved from https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/jhm/article/view/3102
Nazara, I., Burhanudin, K., & Frans, M. P. (2025). Makna Yuridis Tindak Pidana yang Sifatnya Ringan dalam Konsep Judicial Pardon Ditinjau Berdasarkan Asas Legalitas. Widya Yurisdika: Jurna Hukum, 8(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i1.5573
Ningtias, A. D., & Shofa, A. F. (2024). Sinkronasi Konsep Pemaafan Hakim Sebagai Wujud Asas Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Risalah Hukum, 20(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v20i1.1372
Paulina, A. L., & Zulfa, E. A. (2024). Sentencing Guidelines and Rechterlijk Pardon in Article 54 Paragraph (1) and (2) of the Criminal Code 2023. Literacy: International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 3(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v3i3.1977
Putra, A. A. (2025). The Politics of Law Regarding Capital Punishment and the Protection of the Right to Life in Indonesia: A Perspective from Law Number 1 of 2023. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.429
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TAQHEAAAQBAJ
Rezah, F. S., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2021). Custom as a Critical Concept and Siri’ as the Core Concept of Ugi-Mangkasara Culture. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.123
Rivanie, S. S., & Ashar, M. S. I. (2025). Reorientation of Indonesian Criminal Law Politics: Shifting Paradigm from Retributive to Restorative in Death Penalty Regulation. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 869-885. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.544
Rizal, M., Hatta, M., Sumiadi, S., Zulfan, Z., & Husni, H. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Upaya Pembelaan Diri Korban Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(4), 890-908. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v2i4.84
Saman, M. H. R., Kalo, S., Yunara, E., & Ekaputra, M. (2023). Kajian Hukum Ancaman Pidana Penjara Seumur Hidup Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana dalam Penerapan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa, 2(2), 25-34. Retrieved from https://jurnal.mediapencerahanbangsa.co.id/index.php/jpb/article/view/32
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Setyawan, V. P., & Kurniawan, I. D. (2023). Permaafan Hakim dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.59435/jurdikum.v1i1.97
Suhartanto, F. P., & Febrianty, Y. (2024). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law dan Common Law. Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(3), 72-83. Retrieved from https://journal.appisi.or.id/index.php/konsensus/article/view/218
Sukma, F., & Cumbhadrika, C. (2023). Urgensi Penerapan Rechterlijk Pardon Sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif. Gorontalo Law Review, 6(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i1.2678
Wicaksono, B. S., Ismansyah, I., & Elda, E. (2025). Rechterlijke Pardon sebagai Penyeimbang Asas Legalitas dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(4), 2658-2665. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i4.1574
Copyright (c) 2026 Tarisha Ersya Ramadinah, Syarif Saddam Rivanie, Muhammad Said Karim, Afif Muhni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
