The Future of Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Art: Lessons from the Ghiblification Phenomenon
Abstract
The rapid development of AI-generated art that mimics the signature styles of human artists, exemplified by the ghiblification phenomenon, poses a crucial problem for the copyright protection of artistic style, which is traditionally unprotected. This research aims to critically analyze this legal challenge, conduct a comparative study of the copyright regulatory frameworks in Indonesia, the United States, the European Union, and Japan concerning AI art and the issue of artistic style, and formulate policy recommendations for Indonesia. Using a normative juridical research method through statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study examines the legislation, doctrine, and practices in these four jurisdictions. The results show that ghiblification confirms the vulnerability of artistic style; although style as an idea is not protected, the replication of specific expressions by AI can still potentially constitute copyright infringement. The comparative analysis reveals significant variations in approach: the United States strictly requires human authorship, Japan offers flexibility for using data for AI training with a proviso, and the European Union seeks a balance through a TDM exception, while Indonesia still faces a specific regulatory vacuum. Nevertheless, a global consensus exists on the importance of human creative contribution for the recognition of copyright. It is concluded that the existing copyright legal framework, particularly in Indonesia, is inadequate to respond to the disruption of AI-generated art, thus requiring urgent juridical adaptation. This study recommends legal reform in Indonesia, including the clarification of the status of AI-generated art, the consideration of licensing models, and the strengthening of moral rights aspects in order to balance technological innovation with fair artistic protection.
Downloads
References
Andrini, L. (2018). Redesigning Indonesia Copyright Act to Accommodate Autonomous Intelligent System: Status Quo and Room for Improvement. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 9(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2018-0013
Bauer, P. (2025, April 1). Studio Ghibli. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/money/studio-ghibli
Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2014). Limiting Patents. In R. M. Hilty & K. C. Liu (Eds.), Compulsory Licensing: Practical Experiences and Ways Forward (pp. 313-331). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54704-1_16
Caldwell, M. (2023). What Is an “Author”?-Copyright Authorship of AI Art through a Philosophical Lens. Houston Law Review, 61(2), 411-442. Retrieved from https://houstonlawreview.org/article/92132
Choudhary, G. (2025, April 3). Explained | Studio Ghibli-Style Controversy: Why the Internet is Divided Over AI-Generated Art and what’s at Stake. Mint. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.livemint.com/technology/tech-news/explained-the-rise-of-studio-ghibli-style-ai-art-copyright-creativity-and-controversy-what-s-at-stake-11743690558170.html
Christi, G. A., & Cahyaningsih, D. T. (2024). Problematika Subjek Hukum Hak Cipta Terkait Status “Pencipta” Atas Hasil Artificial Intelligence. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(22), 561-577. Retrieved from https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/8705
Circular of Minister of Communications and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2023 on Artificial Intelligence Ethics. https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/883/t/surat+edaran+menteri+komunikasi+dan+informatika+nomor+9+tahun+2023
Design, D. D. (2018, January 24). The Next Rembrandt: Bringing the Old Master Back to Life. Medium. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://medium.com/@DutchDigital/the-next-rembrandt-bringing-the-old-master-back-to-life-35dfb1653597
Dhanya, D. (2025, March 28). OpenAI’s Ghibli-Style AI Images Spark Copyright Concerns and Artists’ Outrage. Tempo. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://en.tempo.co/read/1991678/openais-ghibli-style-ai-images-spark-copyright-concerns-and-artists-outrage
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market and Amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC [OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 92]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj
Dusollier, S., Kretschmer, M., Margoni, T., Mezei, P., Quintais, J. P., & Rognstad, O. A. (2025, January). Copyright and Generative AI: Opinion of the European Copyright Society. European Copyright Society. https://europeancopyrightsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ecs_opinion_genai_january2025.pdf
European Commission. (2024, November 15). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future: The EU Copyright Legislation. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/copyright-legislation
European Commission. (2025, April 15). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future: AI Act. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
European Parliament. (2021, February 3). European Parliament Resolution of 20 October 2020 on Intellectual Property Rights for the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0277_EN.html
Fleck, A. (2024, September 23). Who’s (Not) Excited About AI? Statista. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://www.statista.com/chart/33118/respondents-excited-about-ai-in-daily-life
Geiger, C. (2024). Elaborating a Human Rights-Friendly Copyright Framework for Generative AI. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 55(7), 1129-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01481-5
Giattino, C., Mathieu, E., Samborska, V., & Roser, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence. Our World in Data. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://ourworldindata.org/artificial-intelligence
Government of India [@mygovindia]. (2025, March 28). Main character? No. He’s the whole storyline Swipe through New India in Studio Ghibli strokes [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/DHvVuG-q92F
Grand View Research. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Market Analysis, 2017 – 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market
Hadjon, P. M., & Djatmiati, T. S. (2016). Argumentasi Hukum. UGM Press.
Hapsari, A. M., & Cahyaningsih, D. T. (2024). Perbandingan Pengaturan Hak Cipta Karya Potret Ditinjau dari Hukum Indonesia dan Jepang. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1814-1825. Retrieved from https://journal.laaroiba.com/index.php/as/article/view/6723
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer. (2024, February 12). Ethical Guidelines on Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Indonesia. https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/tmt/2024-02/ethical-guidelines-on-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-indonesia
Howarth, J. (2025, March 25). 54 New Artificial Intelligence Statistics (Mar 2025). Exploding Topics. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://explodingtopics.com/blog/ai-statistics
Hutson, J. (2024). The Evolving Role of Copyright Law in the Age of AI-Generated Works. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(4), 886-914. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.43
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Irfansyah, A. (2024, July 26). Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Memahami Etika Berteknologi di Era AI. Eduparx. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://eduparx.id/blog/insight/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-ethics-memahami-etika-berteknologi-di-era-ai
Japanese Act Number 48 of 1970 on Copyright. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/4207
Kasap, A. (2019). Copyright and Creative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems: A Twenty-First Century Approach to Authorship of AI-Generated Works in the United States. Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, 19(4), 335-380. Retrieved from https://jbipl.pubpub.org/pub/vhb7rprw
Kharisma, G. (2024, August 13). Data AI Indonesia: Panduan Lengkap. Tech in Asia. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://id.techinasia.com/data-ai-indonesia-panduan-lengkap
Klukosky, F. P., & Kohel, M. D. (2024, January 17). An Update on the State of Play with Generative Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Issues. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/intellectual-property/state-of-play-generative-artifical-intelligence-intellectual-property
Kretschmer, M. (2003). Digital Copyright: The End of an Era. European Intellectual Property Review, 25(8), 333-341.
Kusmayanti, R. (2018). Perbandingan Hukum Hak Cipta Fotografi Tanpa Izin Pencipta di Indonesia dan Amerika. Journal of Judicial Review, 20(2), 274-284. Retrieved from https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jjr/article/view/363
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 on Copyrights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 266, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5599). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1610
Mahardita, Y., & Roisah, K. (2018). Optimizing the Authority of Indonesia Customs in Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (pp. 135-140). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icils-18.2018.26
Margoni, T. (2018, November 10). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and EU Copyright Law: Who Owns AI? Centre for Regulation of the Creative Economy. https://www.create.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-and-eu-copyright-law-who-owns-ai
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. (2024, April 19). AI Guidelines for Business Ver 1.0 Compiled. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2024/0419_002.html
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Notizie. (2025, April 1). Ghiblification: The Viral Wave That’s Swept Away Social Media. AdHub Media. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.notizie.it/en/the-ghiblification-the-viral-wave-that-overwhelms-the-social-networks
O’Brien, M., & Parvini, S. (2025, March 28). ChatGPT’s Viral Studio Ghibli-Style Images Highlight AI Copyright Concerns. The Associated Press. Retrieved April 1, 2025, from https://apnews.com/article/studio-ghibli-chatgpt-images-hayao-miyazaki-openai-0f4cb487ec3042dd5b43ad47879b91f4
Örücü, E., & Nelken, D. (Eds.). (2007). Comparative Law: A Handbook. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Prabandari, A. P. (2013). Komparasi Pengaturan Hak Cipta di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(2), 162-171. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5803
Pramudhito, P. (2023, January 20). Kenapa Visual Ghibli Begitu Nyaman Dinikmati? Froyonion. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.froyonion.com/news/pop/kenapa-visual-ghibli-begitu-nyaman-dinikmati
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Ramalho, A. (2017). Will Robots Rule the (Artistic) World? A Proposed Model for the Legal Status of Creations by Artificial Intelligence Systems. Journal of Internet Law, 21(1), 12-25.
Ramaputra, M., Budiardjo, E. K., Makarim, E., Muhammad, D., Yunkins, H., Komaling, T., Anindito, A., Soekotjo, F. M. E., Fronitasari, D., Adiwijaya, A., Priancha, A., & Mahardika, Z. P. (2021, November 10). Pedoman Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial V 1.00. Kolaborasi Riset dan Inovasi Industri Kecerdasan Artifisial. https://korika.id/document/pedoman-etika-ai-korika
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) [OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Riemer, K., & Peter, S. (2024). Conceptualizing Generative AI as Style Engines: Application Archetypes and Implications. International Journal of Information Management, 79, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102824
Riemer, K., & Peter, S. (2025, April 1). ChatGPT’s Studio Ghibli-Style Images Show Its Creative Power – But Raise New Copyright Problems. The Conversation. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://theconversation.com/chatgpts-studio-ghibli-style-images-show-its-creative-power-but-raise-new-copyright-problems-253438
Ruipérez, C., Gutiérrez, E., Puente, C., & Olivas, J. A. (2017). New Challenges of Copyright Authorship in AI. In H. R. Arabnia et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 291-296). CSREA Press.
Salsabila, N. (2024, October 1). Survei: Indonesia Peringkat 4 Negara Paling Antusias dengan AI. MiiTel. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://miitel.com/id/survei-indonesia-peringkat-4-negara-paling-antusias-dengan-ai
Simbolon, P. G. M. (2023). Implementation of the Fair Use Defense Doctrine and Minimum Standards Principle in Copyright Dispute Settlement. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.263
Tektona, R. I., Sari, N. K., & Alfaris, M. R. (2021). Quo Vadis Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Indonesia: Perbandingan Konsep Ciptaan Artificial Intelligence di Beberapa Negara. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 12(2), 285-305. Retrieved from https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/2144
Tenenbaum, J. B., & Freeman, W. T. (2000). Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models. Neural Computation, 12(6), 1247-1283. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976600300015349
Thompson, S. A. (2024, January 25). We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. The New York Times. Retrieved April 4, 2025, from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/25/business/ai-image-generators-openai-microsoft-midjourney-copyright.html
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021, November 23). UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Key Facts (SHS/2023/PI/H/1). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385082
United States Code: Title 17 - Copyright Act of 1976 [Public Law 94-553, Approved on October 19, 1976]. https://www.copyright.gov/title17
United States Copyright Office. (2023, February 21). Cancellation Decision re: Zarya of the Dawn (Registration # VAu001480196). https://www.copyright.gov/docs/zarya-of-the-dawn.pdf
United States Copyright Office, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 101 (3d ed. 2021). https://www.copyright.gov/comp3
Warren, S., & Grasser, J. (2024, March 12). Japan’s New Draft Guidelines on AI and Copyright: Is It Really OK to Train AI Using Pirated Materials? Privacy World. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://www.privacyworld.blog/2024/03/japans-new-draft-guidelines-on-ai-and-copyright-is-it-really-ok-to-train-ai-using-pirated-materials
The White House [@whitehouse]. (2025, March 27). Virginia Basora-Gonzalez, a previously deported alien felon convicted of fentanyl trafficking, was arrested by @icegov in Philadelphia after illegally reentering [Photograph]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/DHtsRgiRzFL
Wibowo, A. M. (2021). Perbandingan Hukum Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Online Indonesia dan Cina. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i2.16372
Yanisky-Ravid, S. (2017). Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Accountability in the 3A Era—The Human-Like Authors are Already Here—A New Model. Michigan State Law Review, 659-726. Retrieved from https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/956
Zeff, M. (2025, March 26). OpenAI’s Viral Studio Ghibli Moment Highlights AI Copyright Concerns. TechCrunch. Retrieved April 2, 2025, from https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/26/openais-viral-studio-ghibli-moment-highlights-ai-copyright-concerns
Zibner, J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: A Creative Player in the Game of Copyright. European Journal of Law and Technology, 10(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/662
Zirpoli, C. T. (2023, February 24). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922
Copyright (c) 2025 Afrizal Mukti Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
