The Qualified Mens Rea Model: Layered Culpability in General Commodity Smuggling Offenses Implicating Corruption

Penulis

  • R. Bayu Probo Sutopo Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • John Pieris Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aarce Tehupeiory Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Hulman Panjaitan Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v8i1.702

Kata Kunci:

Barang Komoditas Umum, Kesalahan Berlapis, Mens Rea, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan

Abstrak

Sistem peradilan pidana nasional masih menghadapi kesulitan dalam membuktikan niat jahat atau mens rea pada tindak pidana penyelundupan barang komoditas umum yang memiliki hubungan normatif dengan tindak pidana korupsi. Kesulitan tersebut muncul ketika pembuktian kesalahan hanya diarahkan pada keadaan batin individual. Sebaliknya, tindak pidana ekonomi modern sering dilakukan melalui korporasi, rangkaian kegiatan pengangkutan barang, pengelolaan dokumen kepabeanan, dan penggunaan kewenangan jabatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan merumuskan instrumen untuk menilai kesalahan aparatur negara dan entitas korporasi secara proporsional tanpa melampaui asas legalitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan perbandingan secara terbatas. Doktrin hukum perbandingan, seperti pengabaian risiko oleh korporasi, doktrin pertanggungjawaban pejabat korporasi, pengabaian sadar terhadap risiko yang besar, dan ketidaktahuan yang disengaja, digunakan sebagai instrumen konseptual, bukan sebagai dasar pemidanaan langsung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Qualified Mens Rea Model dapat dikonstruksikan sebagai kerangka evaluasi berlapis yang mencakup dimensi subjektif, normatif, fungsional-korporasi, dan fungsional-korupsi. Model tersebut kemudian dioperasionalkan ke dalam Matriks Mekanisme Pembuktian Berlapis yang menempatkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dalam hubungan normatif yang saling berkaitan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa model tersebut dapat membantu hakim membedakan tindak pidana penyelundupan barang komoditas umum, penyalahgunaan kewenangan, suap jabatan, dan diskresi kebijakan yang sah secara lebih tepat.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Ali, H. M., Said, M. H. M., & Man, S. Z. B. C. (2023). Corporate Culture as Means of Proving Mens Rea in Corporate Criminal Liability Under Malaysian Anti-Corruption Law. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 33, 119-131. https://doi.org./10.17576/juum-2023-33-10

Arief, B. N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru (Edisi Kedua). Kencana Prenada Media Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Clc_DwAAQBAJ

Ariyanto, Y. W. B., Haniyah, H., & Handayani, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Penyelundupan Pakaian Bekas Impor. Al-Mikraj: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 5(1), 740-754. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v5i01.6156

Arsyad, N., Husen, L. O., Hasyim, S., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2026). The Nature of Mechanism for Enforcing the Ethics and Honor of State Administrators as a Preventive Measure for Corrupt Practices. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2620142

Artadi, M. W. B., & Dewi, D. S. K. (2024). Analisis Politik pada Kasus Korupsi di Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2023. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(2), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i2.3697

Ashworth, A., & Horder, J. (2013). Principles of Criminal Law (Seventh Edition). Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=EqecAQAAQBAJ

Atmasasmita, R. (2017). Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=HNq1EAAAQBAJ

Behuku, J. G., Kusuma, J. I., Chasanah, N. U., Sugianto, F., & Indradewi, A. A. (2025). A The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464

Epstein, R. A. (2004). Cases and Materials on Torts (Eighth Edition). Aspen Publishers. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jZc-AQAAIAAJ

Fauzia, M., & Djumena, E. (2019, December 5). Ini Kronologi Penyelundupan Harley Davidson dan Brompton di Pesawat Garuda. Kompas. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://money.kompas.com/read/2019/12/05/170549626/ini-kronologi-penyelundupan-harley-davidson-dan-brompton-di-pesawat-garuda

Fletcher, G. P. (2000). Rethinking Criminal Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195136951.001.0001

Hamzah, A. (1994). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=oLD3SAAACAAJ

Harefa, N. S. K., Manik, G. K., Marpaung, I. K. Y., & Batubara, S. A. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68

Horder, J. (2019). Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law (Ninth Edition). Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Wt-RDwAAQBAJ

Huda, C. (2011). Dari ‘Tiada Pidana tanpa Kesalahan Menuju’ kepada ‘Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana tanpa Kesalahan’: Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Kencana Prenada Media Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ofpDDwAAQBAJ

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Iswanto, A. (2025, September 5). Implementasi KUHP Nasional dalam Pembuktian Unsur Kesengajaan pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://pt-jakarta.go.id/berita/artikel/4112

Kharismadohan, A. (2020). Mens Rea and State Loses on Corruption Cases: An Analysis of Corruption Court Judgment of Semarang. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i1.35407

Latif, A., & Halim, A. (2023). Judicial Control over Government’s Abuse of Authority through Administrative and Corruption Law. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(2), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i2.732

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1995 on Customs (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1995 Number 75, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3612). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/502

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/432

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/351

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2006 on Amendment to Law Number 10 of 1995 on Customs (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2006 Number 93, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4661). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/73

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818

Liszt, F. V. (1921). Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrechts. Walter de Gruyter. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=W2A8EAAAQBAJ

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Revised Edition). PT Rineka Cipta.

Muhid, H. K., Alifa, S., Ferdianto, R., Yandwiputra, A. R., Sari, A. R., Febiola, A., Yuantisya, M., Pebrianto, F., & Diana, L. (2025, July 17). Diputus Jumat Ini, Berikut Sederet Kejanggalan Kasus Tom Lembong. Tempo. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://tempo.co/hukum/2025723

Munthe, R. D. P., Siregar, A. A., & Siahaan, N. (2026). Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding the Annulment of Acquittal in Corruption Crime Case: A Study of Decision Number 1227 K/Pid.Sus/2022. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1375-1388. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.651

Mustafa, C. (2024). Addressing Willful Blindness: A Multi-Domain Framework for Enhancing Legal Accountability and Fairness. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 13(3), 551-584. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.551-584

Mustopa, H., Sander, M., & Wartoyo, F. X. (2025). Discretion of the Minister of Trade in the Sugar Import Case of 2015–2016 and the Limits of Authority and Accountability in State Administrative Law. Journal of Social Research, 4(10), 2926-2938. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i10.2823

Naufal, M., & Maullana, I. (2021, June 14). Eks Dirut Garuda Ari Askhara Divonis 1 Tahun Penjara dan Denda Rp 300 Juta, Kejari Pikir-Pikir Ajukan Banding. Kompas. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/06/14/21043681/eks-dirut-garuda-ari-askhara-divonis-1-tahun-penjara-dan-denda-rp-300

Netlje, J., Budidarsono, A. S., Yudha, I. T., Mahardhika, D., Ryanto, L., & Kencana, E. A. (2023). Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Dirut Garuda dalam Penyelundupan Barang Secara Ilegal Menurut UU No. 30/2014. Journal of Comprehensive Science, 2(10), 1690-1693. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v2i10.530

Njoto, D. L. B. (2024). Rekonstruksi Asas Actus Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens Rea dalam Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 3344-3355. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3735

Nurmalasari, T. (2025, August 1). Tom Lembong Menerima Abolisi, Begini Mekanisme dan Syaratnya. Tempo. Retrieved January 8, 2026, from https://tempo.co/hukum/2053817

Pawe, T., Husen, L. O., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2025). The Paradox of a Rule of Law State: A Critical Reflection on the Dialectic between Discourse and Reality in the Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia. Sovereign: International Journal of Law, 7(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37276/sijl.v7i1-2.56

Pompe, W. P. J. (1938). Handboek van het Nederlandse Strafrecht (Second Edition). W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=X8CQ0QEACAAJ

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TAQHEAAAQBAJ

Ramadan, T. A., & Mandala, S. (2025). Deconstructing Intentionality: Legal Fallacies in the Indonesian Criminal Code’s Approach to Mens Rea. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 3(9), 1637-1648. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.564

Robbins, I. P. (1990). The Ostrich Instruction: Deliberate Ignorance as a Criminal Mens Rea. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81(2), 191-234. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol81/iss2/1

Rompegading, A. M. (2022). Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.161

Roxin, C. (1994). Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, Band I: Grundlagen – Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre (2. Auflage). C. H. Beck. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=EunhswEACAAJ

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Siahaan, P. N. S. (2021). Elements Testings Distortion of the Abuse of Authority Based on the Government Administration Law and Corruption Crime. Corruptio, 2(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i1.2246

Simons, D. (1929). Leerboek van het Nederlandsche Strafrecht (Tweede Deel). P. Noordhoff. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=s0CzD4hgaQYC

Simons, K. W. (2021). The Willful Blindness Doctrine: Justifiable in Principle, Problematic in Practice. Arizona State Law Journal, 53(2), 655-679. Retrieved from https://arizonastatelawjournal.org/2022/01/20/the-willful-blindness-doctrine-justifiable-in-principle-problematic-in-practice

Sudarto. (1977). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=MKw1OAAACAAJ

Supreme Court of the United States. (1975). United States, Petitioner, v. John R. Park, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Docket Number: 74-215. Decided June 9, 1975. 421 U.S. 658). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/421/658

Sutopo, R. B. P., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). A Juridical Demarcation: Reconstructing the Proof of Mens Rea to Differentiate Policy and Corruption by Public Officials. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 765-784. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.525

Wells, C. (2001). Corporations and Criminal Responsibility (Second Edition). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267935.001.0001

Welzel, H. (1969). Das Deutsche Strafrecht: Eine Systematische Darstellung (Eleventh Edition). Walter de Gruyter. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=iIjNR9yiHK4C

Diterbitkan

2026-06-17

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Sutopo, R. B. P., Pieris, J., Tehupeiory, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2026). The Qualified Mens Rea Model: Layered Culpability in General Commodity Smuggling Offenses Implicating Corruption. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v8i1.702

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama