A Juridical Demarcation: Reconstructing the Proof of Mens Rea to Differentiate Policy and Corruption by Public Officials
Abstract
The enforcement of anti-corruption law in Indonesia confronts a fundamental paradox. The vigorous campaign to eradicate corruption often results in an erosion of legal certainty and an increased risk of policy criminalization. This issue stems from the distortion and inconsistent application of the principle of a guilty mind (mens rea), as judicial practice frequently equates state financial loss or procedural errors with malicious intent. This research aims to reconstruct the principle of proving mens rea by proposing a clear and operational demarcation framework. Using a normative legal research method that integrates the statute, conceptual, and case study approaches, this study analyzes data through systematic and teleological interpretation, culminating in deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that jurisprudence empirically confirms a dangerous blurring of these concepts. As a solution, this study formulates a framework that strictly differentiates among administrative error, policy error, and intentional corruption. The fundamental line of demarcation among these categories is the presence of a valid and convincingly proven mens rea, defined as the intent to enrich oneself or others unlawfully. The primary contribution of this study is to provide a juridical parameter to enhance legal certainty and protect the legitimate discretionary space of public officials. Ultimately, this framework aims to restore criminal law to its function as a last resort (ultimum remedium), thereby making the fight against corruption more targeted, just, and legitimate.
Downloads
References
Ar, A. M., Wirda, W., Rusbandi, A. S., Zulhendra, M., Bahri, S., & Fajri, D. (2024). Peran Niat (Mens Rea) dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.140
Artadi, M. W. B., & Dewi, D. S. K. (2024). Analisis Politik Pada Kasus Korupsi di Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2023. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(2), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i2.3697
Bayuaji, R., Prasetyo, T., & Yudianto, O. (2018). Legal Principle on Confiscation of Corruptor Asset According to the Indonesia Law on Money Laundering in Indonesia Criminal Legal System. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 72, 80-87. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLPG/article/view/42037
Behuku, J. G., Kusuma, J. I., Chasanah, N. U., Sugianto, F., & Indradewi, A. A. (2025). A The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464
Budiman, M. (2023). Criminal Acts Eradication of Corruption in Corporates in Indonesia. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221906
Decarolis, F., Fisman, R., Pinotti, P., & Vannutelli, S. (2025). Rules, Discretion, and Corruption in Procurement: Evidence from Italian Government Contracting. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 3(2), 213-254. https://doi.org/10.1086/732654
Decision of the District Court of Central Jakarta Number 20/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt.Pst on Defendant: Syahrul Yasin Limpo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaef7be32d11cb8283e2313534313531.html
Decision of the District Court of Central Jakarta Number 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt.Pst on Defendant: Thomas Trikasih Lembong. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaf06695084bc9a4a12c303734343332.html
Decision of the District Court of Tangerang Number 192/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tng on Defendant: I Gusti Ngurah Askhara Danadiputra. https://tinyurl.com/pn-tng-no-192-pidsus-2021
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 572 K/Pid/2003 on Defendants: Akbar Tandjung et al. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/storage/uploads/produk_hukum/file/572_K_PID_2003.pdf
Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah-Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing Bureaucratic Corruption: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on What Works. World Development, 105, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2022 Number 238, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6841). https://peraturan.go.id/id/perppu-no-2-tahun-2022
Gunawan, A. (2025). Analysis of the Implementation of Law Number 8 of 2019 in the 2024 Hajj Quota Corruption Case. Journal of Global Corruption, 1(1), 56-72. Retrieved from https://jurnal.cerdaspedia.com/index.php/jgc/article/view/77
Harefa, N. S. K., Manik, G. K., Marpaung, I. K. Y., & Batubara, S. A. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Erlangga.
Huda, C. (2011). Dari Tiada Pidana tanpa Kesalahan Menuju kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana tanpa Kesalahan: Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Huda, S. (2023). Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense. Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 2120-2132. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v3i6.472
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Jones, J. P. (2008). Procedural Due Process. In D. Tanenhaus (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States (pp. 116-117). University of Richmond. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications/370
Kharismadohan, A. (2020). Mens Rea and State Loses on Corruption Cases: An Analysis of Corruption Court Judgment of Semarang. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i1.35407
Klitgaard, R. (1999). Three Levels of Fighting Corruption. In Carter Center Conference on Transparency for Growth in the Americas. The Carter Center. https://www.cartercenter.org/news/documents/doc1193.html
Kurniawan, T. (2022). Discretion as a Factor in Corruption: A Case from Indonesia. Public Integrity, 24(7), 692-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1975939
Laila, N., Fatonah, M., & Rahmah, N. (2025). Seberapa Penting Terpenuhinya Unsur Mens Rea dalam Penetapan Perkara Pidana pada Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia. Triwikrama: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Sosial, 10(12), 141-150. Retrieved from https://ejournal.cahayailmubangsa.institute/index.php/triwikrama/article/view/5680
Latif, A., & Halim, A. (2023). Judicial Control over Government’s Abuse of Authority through Administrative and Corruption Law. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(2), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i2.732
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/432
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/351
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 292, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5601). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1612
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2023 on Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation Into Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 41, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6856). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1825
Mallarangeng, A. B., Mustari, M., Firman, F., & Ali, I. (2023). Pembuktian Unsur Niat Dikaitkan dengan Unsur Mens Rea dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legal: Journal of Law, 2(2), 11-24. Retrieved from https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/69
Moeljatno, M. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Mustopa, H., Sander, M., & Wartoyo, F. X. (2025). Discretion of the Minister of Trade in the Sugar Import Case of 2015–2016 and the Limits of Authority and Accountability in State Administrative Law. Journal of Social Research, 4(10), 2926-2938. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i10.2823
Netlje, J., Budidarsono, A. S., Yudha, I. T., Mahardhika, D., Ryanto, L., & Kencana, E. A. (2023). Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Dirut Garuda dalam Penyelundupan Barang Secara Ilegal Menurut UU No. 30/2014. Journal of Comprehensive Science, 2(10), 1690-1693. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v2i10.530
Opit, S. E., & Frans, M. P. (2025). Proving Securities Trading Fraud in Capital Market Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.413
Pawe, T., Husen, L. O., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2025). The Paradox of a Rule of Law State: A Critical Reflection on the Dialectic between Discourse and Reality in the Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia. Sovereign: International Journal of Law, 6(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37276/sijl.v7i1-2.56
Putra, M. A. A. (2021). Bentuk Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah yang Tidak Dapat Dipidana. Justisi, 7(2), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v7i2.1362
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Ramadan, T. A., & Mandala, S. (2025). Deconstructing Intentionality: Legal Fallacies in the Indonesian Criminal Code’s Approach to Mens Rea. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 3(9), 1637-1648. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.564
Rompegading, A. M. (2022). Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.161
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Siahaan, P. N. S. (2021). Elements Testings Distortion of the Abuse of Authority Based on the Government Administration Law and Corruption Crime. Corruptio, 2(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i1.2246
Skolnik, T. (2017). Objective Mens Rea Revisited. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 22(3), 307-340. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3040883
Suhartono, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). Normative Reconstruction of Asset Forfeiture: A Legal Pathway Following Demise of Corruption Suspects. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 682-707. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.511
Wei, W. (2022). Fiscal Slack, Rule Constraints, and Government Corruption. Public Administration Review, 82(5), 850-865. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13299
Wibowo, S. (2024). Innovative Strategy for the Application of Discretion in Government Policy in Indonesia: An Analysis. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i1.3357
Wirawan, S., Adolf, H., & Hernawati, R. A. S. (2024). Law Enforcement for Commitment Making Officials Who Make Overpayments for Procurement of Goods/Services without Mens Rea. Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 128-142. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Justi/article/view/4292
Copyright (c) 2025 R. Bayu Probo Sutopo, Hulman Panjaitan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
