A Dual-Track Asset Recovery Model: Optimizing the Posthumous Forfeiture of Corruption Proceeds

Penulis

  • Anang Suhartono Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • John Pieris Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Aarce Tehupeiory Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Hulman Panjaitan Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v8i1.700

Kata Kunci:

Gugatan Keperdataan Negara, Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pemulihan Aset Jalur Ganda, Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan, Perampasan Pascakematian

Abstrak

Transisi hukum positif nasional pascapemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 menimbulkan ketidakselarasan dogmatik akibat pengabaian legislatif dalam penentuan status hukum barang bukti ketika penuntutan pidana personal (in personam) dinyatakan gugur demi hukum karena kematian tersangka tindak pidana korupsi. Kelemahan normatif tersebut diperkuat oleh keterbatasan inheren sistem berurutan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999. Dalam sistem tersebut, gugatan keperdataan oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara baru dapat diaktifkan setelah proses pidana dihentikan atau tidak dapat dilanjutkan, sehingga menimbulkan penyusutan nilai aset dan rentang waktu yang memungkinkan pengalihan hasil tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual sebagai pendekatan utama dan pendekatan perundang-undangan sebagai pendekatan pendukung melalui analisis kualitatif preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menawarkan rekonstruksi paradigma menuju sistem paralel-simultan melalui model pemulihan aset jalur ganda. Melalui model ini, pemeriksaan status kebendaan (in rem) dapat berjalan secara mandiri tanpa bergantung pada status hukum pihak yang menjadi subjek penuntutan pidana. Model ini memperkuat perlindungan hukum yang seimbang dan proses hukum yang adil dengan menerapkan standar pembuktian keseimbangan kemungkinan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan percepatan pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Perampasan Aset, amendemen terbatas terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025, serta pembentukan pusat pemulihan aset terpadu untuk mengoptimalkan perampasan hasil tindak pidana korupsi pascakematian tersangka dan memulihkan kepercayaan publik terhadap penegakan hukum.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang-dasar

Anisa, T., & Nelson, F. M. (2024). Asset Forfeiture through Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture and Management of Criminal Proceeds Assets: A Comparative Study with the United States and Thailand. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(2), 1137-1161. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.4183

Arsyad, N., Husen, L. O., Hasyim, S., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2026). The Nature of Mechanism for Enforcing the Ethics and Honor of State Administrators as a Preventive Measure for Corrupt Practices. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2620142

Boong, V. R., Irawan, J. E., Ibrahim, C., & Jonathan, S. (2023). Asset Return in Money Laundering. Corruptio, 4(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v4i2.3237

Cassella, S. D. (2019). Lecture: Asset Forfeiture in the United States. Latin American Legal Studies, 4, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.15691/0719-9112vol4a1

Chistyakova, Y., Wall, D. S., & Bonino, S. (2021). The Back-Door Governance of Crime: Confiscating Criminal Assets in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 27(4), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09423-5

Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail

Flora, M. (2020, September 2). Fakta-Fakta Kasus Bunuh Diri Mantan Kepala BPN Denpasar Pakai Senpi Ilegal. Liputan6.com. Retrieved February 20, 2026, from https://liputan6.com/news/read/4345564

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pvIWAwAAQBAJ

Greenberg, T. S., Samuel, L. M., Grant, W., & Gray, L. (2009). Stolen Asset Recovery : A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. The World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/2615

Heathershaw, J., & Mayne, T. (2023). Explaining Suspicious Wealth: Legal Enablers, Transnational Kleptocracy, and the Failure of the UK’s Unexplained Wealth Orders. Journal of International Relations and Development, 26(2), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00296-0

Herdiana, A. D. (2026). Procedural Law Dualism in Asset Forfeiture Regime: Conflict of Evidentiary Norms and Judicial Oversight Regarding Human Rights Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1146-1161. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.625

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Jumantoro, T. R. P., Satya, R. M., & Rahmadani, F. N. (2025). Analisis Kerangka Regulasi Asset Forfeiture dalam Mengakhiri Praktik Impunitas Korupsi: Studi Komparasi dengan Negara Singapura, Inggris, dan Thailand. Jurnal Inspektorat, 1(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.64527/inspektorat.v1i1.10

Latifansyah, M. A., Rifai, A., & Sadino, S. (2024). Legal Measures to Support the Process of Asset Recovery in the State-Owned Enterprises Banking Sector Post-Corruption Cases. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(2), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v27i2.514

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/755

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/432

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/351

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2025 Number 188, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7149). https://dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/2011

Pawe, T., Husen, L. O., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2025). The Paradox of a Rule of Law State: A Critical Reflection on the Dialectic between Discourse and Reality in the Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia. Sovereign: International Journal of Law, 7(1-2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37276/sijl.v7i1-2.56

Prasetya, M. D., Ilyas, A., Arifin, A. P., Fuady, M. I. N., & Saeedi, Y. (2026). Legal Pluralism based on World Policy Hybridization: A Comparison of Malaysian and Iranian Asset Forfeiture. Kosmik Hukum, 26(1), 146-164. Retrieved from https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/kosmik/article/view/28698

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TAQHEAAAQBAJ

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PMdsAAAAIAAJ

Remmelink, J. (2003). Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Trans. by T. P. Moeliono). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=JC_8uAAACAAJ

Salwa, A. M. (2026). The Future of Indonesian Asset Confiscation through the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) Mechanism: A Comparative Study with the UK. Jurist-Diction, 9(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v9i1.71880

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Sandhy, A. P., & Panjaitan, H. (2026). The Cost Burden Paradox in Petty Corruption Enforcement: A Socio-Legal Study Based on Cost-Awareness. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1058-1077. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.564

Sianipar, F. A., Sambas, N., & Yanto, O. (2024). The Indonesian Arrangement of Asset Forfeiture Draft as Reform Efforts in Recovering State Losses Due to Corruption: A Comparative Study of United States Code. Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice, 3(2), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v3i2.509

Suhartono, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). Normative Reconstruction of Asset Forfeiture: A Legal Pathway Following Demise of Corruption Suspects. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 682-707. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.511

Sutopo, R. B. P., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). A Juridical Demarcation: Reconstructing the Proof of Mens Rea to Differentiate Policy and Corruption by Public Officials. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 765-784. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.525

Syauket, A. (2025). Sita Jaminan Terhadap Harta Waris Koruptor: Pendekatan Nuansa Procedural Perdata Guna Memaksimalkan Pengembalian Aset Menuju Good Governance. Journal of Law and Security Studies, 2(1), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.31599/j72r8b58

Tantimin, T. (2023). Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102

Zainab, N., Tumanggor, M. S., Syauket, A., & Tobing, C. I. (2025). Asset Forfeiture and the Management of Seized and Confiscated Property as an Effort toward Asset Recovery in Indonesia and Thailand. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(3), 762-772. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.536

Zyham, Z., Marlina, A., & Suhartina, S. (2022). Asset Recovery Corruption by the Heirs. Delictum: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.35905/delictum.v1i2.3189

Diterbitkan

2026-06-17

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Suhartono, A., Pieris, J., Tehupeiory, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2026). A Dual-Track Asset Recovery Model: Optimizing the Posthumous Forfeiture of Corruption Proceeds. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v8i1.700

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama