The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Cybercrime: A Case Study of Online Fraud in South Sulawesi

Penulis

  • Zulfan Akbar Syahfallah Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Askari Razak Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Salle Salle Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.557

Kata Kunci:

Disparitas Penegakan Hukum, Kejahatan Siber, Kesenjangan Normatif, Penipuan, Transisi Hukum Pidana

Abstrak

Eskalasi tindak pidana penipuan siber di wilayah hukum Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Selatan menghadirkan tantangan serius bagi otoritas penegak hukum, terutama ketika dihadapkan pada keterbatasan instrumen regulasi konvensional yang gagal menjangkau karakteristik kejahatan digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam disparitas penegakan hukum yang dipicu oleh kesenjangan normatif antara penerapan Pasal 378 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 beserta perubahannya, mengevaluasi hambatan struktural dan kultural yang mendistorsi efektivitas penyidikan, serta memproyeksikan solusi sistemik melalui transisi Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Menggunakan metode penelitian socio-legal dengan pendekatan kualitatif, studi ini mengintegrasikan analisis doktrinal dengan data empiris yang diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam terhadap penyidik, hakim, dan korban. Hasil penelitian mengungkap fakta krusial mengenai disharmoni regulasi, di mana aparat penegak hukum mengalami inersia dalam memanfaatkan wewenang pemutusan akses digital akibat ketidaksiapan infrastruktur forensik di tingkat kewilayahan dan rendahnya literasi hukum masyarakat. Fenomena ini menciptakan paradoks penegakan hukum yang tumpul dan melanggengkan disparitas putusan pengadilan. Sebagai simpulan, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa reformasi parsial tidak lagi memadai untuk mengatasi kompleksitas kejahatan siber. Implikasi studi merekomendasikan langkah konkret berupa penyusunan prosedur operasional standar yang adaptif terhadap Pasal 493 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023, desentralisasi laboratorium forensik, serta adopsi inovasi sanksi pencabutan hak akses internet sebagai strategi pemidanaan futuristik yang menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan restoratif.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

A’Raaf, F. A., Rahman, S., & Badaru, B. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Korban Penipuan Jual Beli Mobil Melalui Aplikasi Facebook. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(1), 253-268. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article/view/1678

Adrianto, A., Thalib, H., & Ilyas, M. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1445-1457. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1946

Akbar, M. A., Kamal, M., & Badaru, B. (2024). Efektivitas Peran Kepolisan Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online di Dunia Maya. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 877-893. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1867

Alamsyah, F. R., Cameron, C., Ridwan, P., Yustisia, M. T., Romadhon, M. R. R., & Yusuf, N. T. (2023). Problems in the Application of Law in the Indra Kenz Fraudulent Investment Case. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v4i1.67847

Amirullah, S., & Sodikin, S. (2026). The Principle of Legality vs. Digital Sentencing Innovation: The Dialectics of Revocation of Internet Access Rights as a Criminal Penalty in Cybercrime Cases. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1078-1096. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.553

Ekawati, D., Herdiana, D., & Haryanti, A. (2025). Phishing in the Banking Sector: Between Cybercrime and Consumer Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.422

Gadjong, A. A. (2023). The Agreement of Personal Shopping Service through E-Commerce Platforms: A Case Study of Consumer Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.230

Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2020). Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi oleh Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 314-323. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.314-323

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Kharisma, D. B., & Ar, N. T. E. (2022). Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative Model for Dispute Settlement in the Financial Technology Sector. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 17(1), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.25267

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2008 Number 58, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4843). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/138

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 on Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 251, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5952). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1683

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2024 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6905). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1842

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2025 Number 188, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7149). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/2011

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edition). Sage. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ

Nur, T., & Panggabean, R. R. (2021). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Payment Method among Generation Z: The Extended UTAUT Approach. Journal of Accounting Research Organization and Economics, 4(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v4i1.19644

Nuraksari, Y., Thalib, H., & Salle, S. (2024). Efektivitas Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Travel Umrah. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(2), 745-762. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article/view/1852

Oktana, R., Akub, S., & Maskun, M. (2023). Social Media in the Process of Evidence of Electronic Information and Transaction Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252

Opit, S. E., & Frans, M. P. (2025). Proving Securities Trading Fraud in Capital Market Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.413

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TAQHEAAAQBAJ

Rafique, R. B., & Venugopal, V. (2021). Preventive Measures to Mitigate the Risk of Fraud in Letters of Credit Transactions in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.12.1.2021.7882

Rahmawati, N. D. (2024). Law Enforcement against Online Arisan Fraud Perpetrators Who Conduct Fictitious Arisan Auctions (Case Study of Sukoharjo Police Station Cases). Serunai, 2(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.63019/serunai.v2i2.54

Rauf, A., Rahman, S., & Razak, A. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Media Elektronik. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(1), 77-93. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1624

Ruslan, Z. (2022). Letter of Credit: Uniform Custom Practice dan Fraud dalam Perdagangan Internasional. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, 10(2), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v10i2.118

Sakina, P. (2025, October 15). Komdigi: Keamanan Ekosistem E-commerce Jadi Tanggung Jawab Bersama. Antara. Retrieved November 22, 2025, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5176273/komdigi-keamanan-ekosistem-e-commerce-jadi-tanggung-jawab-bersama

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Sihombing, R. P., Kusno, K., & Siregar, A. A. (2024). Investigative Effectiveness in the Digital Era: A Case Study of Technological Innovation at the Rokan Hilir Police Resort. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.368

Sukadana, I. M., Amiruddin, A., & Parman, L. (2018). Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi Mahkota dalam Perkara Pidana Pencurian. Law Reform, 14(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20873

Triananda, R. K., Razak, A., & Mappaselleng, N. F. (2024). Efektivitas Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Online. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 471-486. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1808

Zuvarcan, D. A., Yuspin, W., & Budiono, A. (2025). Qualitative Study of Fraud in Health Services and Legal Framework in Indonesia: A Literature Review. Diponegoro Law Review, 10(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.42-53

Diterbitkan

2026-01-24

Cara Mengutip

Syahfallah, Z. A., Razak, A., & Salle, S. (2026). The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Cybercrime: A Case Study of Online Fraud in South Sulawesi. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1116-1130. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.557

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama