Implementation of Restorative Justice for Narcotic Abusers: A Case Study in the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office

  • Resky Ayu Lestari Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Syarif Saddam Rivanie Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Slamet Sampurno Soewondo Universitas Hasanuddin

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze how the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office applies the Guidelines of Attorney General Number 18 of 2021. This research uses an empirical legal research method. All collected data is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer the research objectives. The results show that Sofyan Setiawan’s case is the sole example of implementing restorative justice, aligning with the Guidelines of Attorney General Number 18 of 2021 at the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office. The entire legal process, from the drafting of the legal opinion by the Public Prosecutor to the issuance of Letter Number B-230/P.4.32/Es.1/08/2022 by the Head of the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office, demonstrates compliance with formal and material completeness. Instructions for resolving the case were subsequently forwarded to the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi. The progression to restorative justice was documented in Letter Number R-/P.4.4/Enz.1/08/2022, issued by the Assistant for General Crimes on behalf of the Head of the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi. Sofyan Setiawan then effectively underwent rehabilitation from August 3 to December 3, 2022, at the Baddoka Narcotic Rehabilitation Center in Makassar. Therefore, several recommendations can be proposed to the relevant stakeholders. First, the Head of the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office and the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi should collaborate to identify the formal and material completeness criteria enabling broader implementation of restorative justice. Second, the Assistant for General Crimes and the Public Prosecutor are advised to develop a systematic evaluation mechanism to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation as one of the options for resolving narcotic criminal cases. Third, the Baddoka Narcotic Rehabilitation Center in Makassar and relevant institutions in Makassar are recommended to enhance the capacity of their facilities and rehabilitation services, especially considering the high number of narcotic cases. These measures aim to improve the effectiveness and scope of restorative justice in handling similar cases in the future.

Keywords: Narcotic, Public Prosecution Service, Rehabilitation, Restorative Justice

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bumi, S. K., Supolo, S., & Nugroho, B. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(2), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.1860

Dale, E., Kelly, P. J., Lee, K. S. K., Conigrave, J. H., Ivers, R., & Clapham, K. (2019). Systematic Review of Addiction Recovery Mutual Support Groups and Indigenous People of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States of America and Hawaii. Addictive Behaviors, 98, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106038

Decision of the District Court of Takalar Number 60/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Tka. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaed16d599081c4ea008313135303136.html

Fatir, M. D. (2023, July 6). Kemenkumham Sulsel Berkomitmen Mencegah Penyalagunaan Narkotika. Antara Sulsel. Retrieved July 17, 2023, from https://makassar.antaranews.com/berita/490554/kemenkumham-sulsel-berkomitmen-mencegah-penyalagunaan-narkotika

Félix, S., & Portugal, P. (2017). Drug Decriminalization and the Price of Illicit Drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 39, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.014

Golovin, D., Koropatov, O., & Korniienko, M. (2022). Electronic Evidence in Proving Crimes of Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Turnover. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(14), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-n000217

Guidelines of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2021 on Complete the Handling of Narcotic Abuse Cases through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach as an Implementation of the Dominus Litis Principle for Prosecutors. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PEDOMAN-18-TAHUN-2021.pdf

Gukguk, R. G. R., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Tindak Pidana Narkotika sebagai Transnasional Organized Crime. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.337-351

Husen, L. O., Salle, S., Syalman, A. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2020). Pengamanan Intelijen Kepolisian Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Atas Objek Sengketa. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.62

Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Revision Edition). Mirra Buana Media.

Istiqamah, N. (2022, August 31). Kapolda Ungkap Sulsel Darurat Narkoba Usai Catat 3.260 Kasus 2 Tahun Terakhir. Detik Sulsel. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://www.detik.com/sulsel/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-6264935/kapolda-ungkap-sulsel-darurat-narkoba-usai-catat-3260-kasus-2-tahun-terakhir

Kammersgaard, T. (2023). From Punishment to Help? Continuity and Change in the Norwegian Decriminalization Reform Proposal. International Journal of Drug Policy, 113, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103963

Kasahun, A. E., Woldeyohanins, A. E., Kifle, Z. D., Abebe, R. B., Ergena, A. E., & Demeke, C. A. (2022). Compliance of Private Pharmacy Retail Outlets to Narcotic Drug Regulations in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional and Simulated Client Study Method. Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 56, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221090910

Kefas, R. (2022, August 11). Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum Menyetujui Dua Pengajuan Restorative Justice dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jangkar Pena. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://jangkarpena.com/jaksa-agung-muda-tindak-pidana-umum-menyetujui-2-dua-pengajuan-restorative-justice-dalam-tindak-pidana-narkotika

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/1357

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 on the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number 67, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4401). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/17

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 143, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5062). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/568

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 on Amendment to Law Number 16 of 2004 on the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2021 Number 298, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6755). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/1788

Letter of the Head of the High Attorney’s Office of South Sulawesi Number R-/P.4.4/Enz.1/08/2022 on the Request for Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in Narcotic Abuse Cases, on Behalf of Suspect Sofyan Setiawan, a.k.a. Awal Bin Nawir Dg. Serang.

Letter of the Head of the Public Attorney’s Office of Takalar Number B-230/P.4.32/Es.1/08/2022 on the Application for a Proposal to Complete the Handling of Narcotic Abuse Cases through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach, on Behalf of Suspect Sofyan Setiawan, a.k.a. Awal Bin Nawir Dg. Serang.

Palad, V., & Snyder, J. (2019). “We Don’t Want Him Worrying about How He Will Pay to Save His Life”: Using Medical Crowdfunding to Explore Lived Experiences with Addiction Services in Canada. International Journal of Drug Policy, 65, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.016

Prasetya, M. D., Sari, I. P., Said, S., & Akbar, A. (2023). Forms and Developments of Narcotics Crime During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.164

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rivanie, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, M. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan Teori-Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176-188. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.4

Rivanie, S. S., Soewondo, S. S., Azisa, N., Abadi, M. T., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Application of Imprisonment to Kleptomaniacs: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169

Rumadan, I. (2013). Problem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia dan Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(2), 263-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.263-276

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Seear, K., & Fraser, S. (2014). The Addict as Victim: Producing the ‘Problem’ of Addiction in Australian Victims of Crime Compensation Laws. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(5), 826-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.02.016

Sholihah, Q. (2015). Efektivitas Program P4GN terhadap Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Napza. Kemas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 10(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v10i2.3376

Yuherawan, D. S. B., & Rosdiana, B. S. (2020). Ketidaktepatan Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2), 177-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2207

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Lestari, R. A., Rivanie, S. S., & Soewondo, S. S. (2023). Implementation of Restorative Justice for Narcotic Abusers: A Case Study in the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.275

Most read articles by the same author(s)