Peninjauan Kembali terhadap Putusan Praperadilan: Analisis Kritis Kewenangan dan Pengaruhnya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.367Kata Kunci:
Hak Asasi Manusia, Hukum Acara Pidana, Peninjauan Kembali, PraperadilanAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan hukum yang berkaitan dengan pengajuan PK terhadap Putusan Praperadilan dan implikasinya bagi penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan di Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menelaah berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan dan doktrin hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan mengajukan PK terhadap Putusan Praperadilan merupakan isu hukum yang kompleks. Meskipun KUHAP tidak mencantumkan secara eksplisit, namun terdapat landasan hukum yang memungkinkan PK tersebut diajukan. Tersangka, Penasehat Hukum, dan Jaksa merupakan subjek hukum yang berwenang mengajukan permohonan PK. Kendati demikian, implementasi PK terhadap Putusan Praperadilan masih dihadapkan pada sejumlah tantangan, khususnya terkait pemahaman publik dan aksesibilitas terhadap sistem peradilan. Putusan PK terhadap Putusan Praperadilan memiliki implikasi yang luas, tidak hanya mempengaruhi nasib individu yang berperkara, tetapi juga berkontribusi signifikan terhadap perlindungan HAM, kepastian hukum, dan peningkatan kualitas penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Mahkamah Agung, sebagai lembaga peradilan tertinggi, memiliki peran penting dalam memberikan pedoman yang jelas dan komprehensif mengenai teknis pelaksanaan PK terhadap Putusan Praperadilan, baik melalui penerbitan yurisprudensi, Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, maupun reformasi hukum acara pidana. Reformasi prosedur pengajuan PK, yang mencakup penyederhanaan prosedur, intensifikasi sosialisasi, dan optimalisasi peran lembaga bantuan hukum, menjadi krusial dalam meningkatkan akses keadilan dan perlindungan HAM.
Unduhan
Referensi
Alamsyah, F. R., Cameron, C., Ridwan, P., Yustisia, M. T., Romadhon, M. R. R., & Yusuf, N. T. (2023). Problems in the Application of Law in the Indra Kenz Fraudulent Investment Case. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v4i1.67847
Arifin, F. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Indonesian Democracy: A Perspective on the Sovereignty of Law and the Distribution of Power. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.353
Asnatuti, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2019). Peran Penasehat Hukum dalam Membantu Tersangka pada Penyidikan Guna Terciptanya Proses Hukum yang Adil. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 66-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v10i1.157
Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90
Fitrah, F. A., Takariawan, A., & Muttaqin, Z. (2021). The Position of Civil Servant Investigator of Directorate General of Tax (DGT) in the Frame of Taxation Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.107
Hellqvist, S. (2021). Access to Justice for Wrongful Conviction Claimants in Sweden: The Final Legal Safeguard and Levels of (In)accessibility. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39(3), 320-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2021.2010909
Irmawaty, I., & Burhany, M. (2022). The Principle of Listening to Both Sides in the Sinjai District Court: A Case Study of Court Decision. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2.366
Karindra, A. B. (2024). Pretrial Efforts to Realize Legal Provisions that Are Proportional and Do Not Contract the Perspective Pancasila Law. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5516
Kelsen, H. (1960). The Pure Theory of Law (Trans. by M. Knight). University of California Press.
Kokoszkiewicz, A., & Tokarski, T. (2024). Dilemmas of Justice in Law – the Historical-Legal and Semantic Aspects of Justice. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie, 17(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.8535
Laia, F. F. D. (2024). The Urgency of Enacting Government Regulation on Community Service Sentence in Indonesian under the New Penal Code. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i1.350
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/755
Martono, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penangkapan dan Penahanan Tersangka dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i1.39
Muryawan, A. G., Mashdurohatun, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2023). Legal Reconstruction of Pretrial Procedure on the Rights of the Applicant or the Applicant Associated with Justice Value-Based Remedy. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 132, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/132-06
Musyarri, F. A., & Sabrina, G. (2023). Pembatasan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(3), 293-309. Retrieved from https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/585
Njoo, C. I. H., Dharmayanti, D., & Sari, S. W. (2020). Prevention of Criminal Prosecution Resulted from Breach of Contract. In H. D. Mulyaningsih (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World 2019 (pp. 276-286). SciTePress Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008430302760286
Oktana, R., Akub, S., & Maskun, M. (2023). Social Media in the Process of Evidence of Electronic Information and Transaction Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252
Pavone, T., & Stiansen, Ø. (2022). The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873
Pech, L. (2022). The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(2), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
Peirone, F. (2024). All in Good Time: Temporal Forms of Public Law Decisions. Transnational Legal Theory, 15(2), 260-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2024.2364450
Prasetya, M. D., Sari, I. P., Said, S., & Akbar, A. (2023). Forms and Developments of Narcotics Crime during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.164
Putri, L. (2023). Effectiveness and Study of the Criminal Law Pretrial System. Enigma in Law, 1(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i1.15
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Memahami Hukum: Dari Konstruksi sampai Implementasi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rivanie, S. S., Soewondo, S. S., Azisa, N., Abadi, M. T., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Application of Imprisonment to Kleptomaniacs: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Situmeang, S. M. T. (2021). Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law. Law Reform, 17(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41746
Stoykova, R. (2023). The Right to a Fair Trial as a Conceptual Framework for Digital Evidence Rules in Criminal Investigations. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801
Yunara, E., & Kemas, T. (2024). The Role of Victimology in the Protection of Crime Victims in Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 3(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v3i01.15379
