Akibat Hukum Pemalsuan Sidik Jari Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Akta Autentik

Penulis

  • Putri Maulia Adam Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Hasim Purba Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Suprayitno Suprayitno Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Hilbertus Sumplisius M. Wau Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.376

Kata Kunci:

Akta Autentik, Pemalsuan Sidik Jari, Pengalihan Hak, PPAT, Tanah dan Bangunan

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif implikasi yuridis pemalsuan sidik jari sebagai pengganti tanda tangan dalam akta autentik, serta menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menangani kasus tersebut, dengan menjadikan Putusan Nomor 87/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Kpn sebagai studi kasus. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Analisis data menggunakan pendekatan analisis isi kualitatif untuk mendeskripsikan permasalahan dan menjawab tujuan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemalsuan sidik jari dalam akta autentik menimbulkan konsekuensi hukum yang multidimensional, meliputi ranah hukum perdata, pidana, dan administrasi. Secara perdata, akta tersebut berpotensi batal demi hukum karena cacat dalam unsur consensus, yang berakibat pada tidak sahnya peralihan hak. Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, perbuatan tersebut merupakan tindak pidana pemalsuan surat. Sementara itu, Notaris atau PPAT yang terlibat atau lalai dapat dikenakan sanksi administratif. Analisis terhadap Putusan Nomor 87/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Kpn memperlihatkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim didasarkan pada prinsip kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan, sekaligus menegaskan pentingnya due diligence, integritas, dan profesionalisme, terutama bagi PPAT dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya untuk menjamin keabsahan dan keautentikan akta autentik.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uud-1945

Adjie, H. (2015). Penafsiran Tematik Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Andriawan, W. (2022). The Existence of the Abuse of Circumstances Doctrine in Agreement Law. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 6(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i1.28292

Auliya, W., & Hafidz, J. (2020). Law Enforcement against Criminal Action with Fingerprint Evidence. Law Development Journal, 2(3), 302-306. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.2.3.302-306

Berlianty, T., Akyuwen, R. J., & Tas’an, D. P. (2023). Bank Credit Restructuring for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Batulis Civil Law Review, 4(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i1.1497

Budify, A., Manurung, J. A. L., & Harianja, S. B. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Hibah di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.77

Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail

Decision of the District Court of Kepanjen Number 87/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Kpn on Lasmani and Suwati v. Kusnadi Bin Lasman and Sukarji Bin Ponirin P. Heri. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/544b2737ed028ac16228b3f8774045fb.html

Decision of the District Court of Kepanjen Number 199/Pid.B/2014/PN.Kpj on Defendant: Sukarji Bin Ponirin. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/57c26e0ea739e4b79237818125551b84.html

Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1161 K/PID/2014 on Defendant: Sukarji Bin Ponirin. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/b918d2658dca1a0af90f4f6680518aa0.html

Dewi, W. W., & Ibrahim, R. (2020). Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap oleh Notaris pada Minuta Akta. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(3), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i03.p01

Dongoran, H. M., & Aminah, A. (2024). Obligations Arising from Contracts and Laws and Their Relationship with Authentic Deeds. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v27i1.444

Gemilang, W. A., & Rahayu, M. I. F. (2024). Juridical Study of Falsification of Power of Sale Deed Made by a Notary Public Official in the Sale and Purchase without the Consent of the Certificate Owner. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(4), 835-840. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i4.510

Giriarti, T., Prihatinah, T. L., & Handayani, S. W. (2023). The Validity of the Sale and Purchase Deed Not Signed in the Presence of a Land Deed Officer. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 7(3), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v7i3.20844

Hamidi, J. (2006). Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI. Konstitusi Press.

Hamzah, Y. A., & Mangarengi, A. A. (2023). The Authority of PPAT in Making AJB Related to Heritage Land Owned by a Minor. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 364-375. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.253

Hassanah, H., Wahyudi, W., & Aziz, N. A. (2023). Standard Clause Problems in E-Commerce Based on Indonesian Civil Law. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 7(2), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v7i2.4226

Heriyanti, H. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris yang Terindikasi Tindak Pidana Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Yustisia, 5(2), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8748

Ibrahim, I. M. A., Sitorus, W., & Rifai, A. (2023). Sale and Purchase of Ships over GT-7 Size without Authentic Deeds in North Morowali Regency. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.280

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1357

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/755

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 on the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 2, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4168). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/299

Mas, M. (2003). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.

Moertiono, R. J. (2022). The Role of the Notary in Making Authentic Deed on the Change of Name Identity. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(2), 248-258. Retrieved from https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/kanun/article/view/35238

Panduwinata, P. A., Purwadi, H., & Novianto, W. T. (2022). Notary Liability in Criminal Acts of Fraud Based on a Power of Buying Deed. Journal of World Science, 1(7), 511-521. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i7.70

Puneri, A. (2021). Comparison of the Law of Contract between Islamic Law and Indonesian Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.39036

Purba, H., & Purba, M. H. Y. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Pengetahuan Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rahmadhani, F. (2020). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta di Bawah Tangan yang Telah Diwaarmerking Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Recital Review, 2(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v2i2.9135

Regulation of Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2018 on the Guidance and Supervision of Land Deed Officials (Bulletin Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 395). https://peraturan.go.id/id/permen-atrbpn-no-2-tahun-2018

Regulation of Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 61 of 2016 on the Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions on Notary Publics (Bulletin Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 2128). https://peraturan.go.id/id/permenkumham-no-61-tahun-2016

Rinaldo, R., & Soponyono, E. (2022). The Role of the Inafist Dactyloscopy in the Murder Investigation Process (Case Study at Polda Central Java). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(12), 5949-5954. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-81

Rosalinda, F., & Aminah, A. (2023). Legal Consequences of Violating the Obligations of Prospective Intern Notary: A Study of Legislation. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.269

Rossulliati, D., Ucuk, Y., & Prawesthi, W. (2023). Criminal Liability of Notary in Criminal Act Committed by Notary Signing Agent. Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice, 2(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v2i1.258

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Sari, V. R., Santoso, B., & Jauharoh, A. (2024). The Existence of Sign Language Interpreters in Assisting Deaf Individuals in the Creation of Notarial Deeds. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 4(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v4i1.671

Siregar, A. R., Suryandari, W. D., & Sejati, H. (2024). Urgency of Implementing Article 1365 of the Civil Code in Addressing Tortious Conduct in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia. Journal of World Science, 3(11), 1519-1530. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i11.1235

Siswanto, H. (2007). Analisis Peran Identifikasi Sidik Jari dalam Pengungkapan Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v1no1.522

Sudjana, S. (2022). Principle of Good Faith in Confidentiality Agreements of Trade Secret Information. Dialogia Iuridica, 14(1), 52-76. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v14i1.5376

Suwignyo, H. (2009). Keabsahan Cap Jempol sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Notarius, 1(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v1i1.1126

Syam, M. R. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2022). Status and Position of the SHM of Condominium Units after a Fire: Makassar Mall Shopping Center. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.218

Syam, M. R. A., Pattitingi, F., & Nur, S. S. (2022). The Legal Subject of Non-Residential Condominium Management Activities: Ujung Pandang Central Market. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.186

Tobing, G. H. S. L. (1999). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Erlangga.

Vitasari, D. A., & Musyafah, A. A. (2023). Akibat Hukum Pembubuhan Cap Ibu Jari sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1523-1536. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3388

Wijayanti, T., Muryanto, Y. T., & Darori, M. I. (2021). Comparation of the Transfer of Land Rights to the Description Deed of Inheritance Rights. Law Reform, 17(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37558

Wirantia, W., Darmawan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2020). PPAT’S Legal Responsibility for the Creation of Empty Deed. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(3), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v4i3.19087

Yanto, N. H. H., & Nasarudin, M. (2021). Regulation of Land Ownership for Foreign Citizens in Indonesia from Agrarian Law Perspective. Progressive Law Review, 3(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.36448/plr.v3i01.44

Diterbitkan

2024-12-23

Cara Mengutip

Adam, P. M., Purba, H., Suprayitno, S., & Wau, H. S. M. (2024). Akibat Hukum Pemalsuan Sidik Jari Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Akta Autentik. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.376