Penerapan Doktrin Fair Use Defense dan Prinsip Standar Minimum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.263Kata Kunci:
Fair Use Defense, Hak Cipta, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Standar MinimumAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis bagaimana sengketa yang timbul akibat pelanggaran hak cipta dapat diselesaikan dengan menerapkan doktrin fair use defense dalam rezim perlindungan hak cipta di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan perbandingan. Bahan hukum yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk mendeskripsikan masalah dan menjawab tujuan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia harus menerapkan doktrin fair use defense sebagai mekanisme dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta. Terlepas dari belum familiarnya di Indonesia, fair use defense sejalan dengan prinsip standar minimum dan prinsip FET yang diatur dalam Perjanjian TRIPs. Perjanjian ini mengikat Indonesia berdasarkan UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1994. Proporsionalitas doktrin ini juga telah diuji melalui temuan hukum oleh Mahkamah Agung AS, yang didasarkan pada Bagian 107 UU Hak Cipta AS. Oleh karena itu, direkomendasikan agar Pemerintah atau Mahkamah Agung menetapkan peraturan pelaksanaan UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 terkait faktor-faktor yang memenuhi syarat fair use atas karya berhak cipta. Di sisi lain, peneliti dan akademisi didorong untuk melakukan penelitian lebih lanjut tentang penerapan doktrin fair use defense. Penelitian ini juga dapat memberikan rekomendasi yang berharga bagi Pemerintah dan DPR dalam memperkuat kerangka hukum dan rezim perlindungan hak cipta Indonesia.
Unduhan
Referensi
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945
Astiti, N. N. A., & Tarantang, J. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase. Jurnal Al-Qardh, 3(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v3i2.1179
Barizah, N. (2016). International Copyright Treaties and Its Implementation under Indonesian Copyright Act; Is It A Better Access to Knowledge? Indonesian Journal of International Law, 14(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol14.1.674
Damian, E. (2006). Plagiat dan Pembajakan sebagai Pelanggaran Hukum Hak Cipta. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 3(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol3.2.397
Dharmawan, N. K. S., & Wiryawan, W. (2014). Keberadaan dan Implikasi Prinsip MFN dan NT dalam Pengaturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 3(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i02.p03
Fauzi, M. R. (2020). Hak Cipta dalam Sudut Pandang Nilai-Nilai Pancasila. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 3(2), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol3.iss2.art2
Gaukrodger, D. (2017). Adressing the Balance of Interest in Investment Treaties: The Limitation of Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions to the Minimum Standard of Treatment under Customary International Law (OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2017/03). OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/0a62034b-en
Haldemann, F. (2005). Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law. Ratio Juris, 18(2), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00293.x
Hutagalung, S. M. (2012). Hak Cipta: Kedudukan & Perannya dalam Pembangunan. Sinar Grafika.
Ingarasi, P., & Suwigno, N. P. (2022). The Benefits of Registered Trademark for MSME Actors in Surakarta City: A Case Study of IPR Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.187
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2009, 18 September). Cargill, Incorporated (Claimant) v. United Mexican States (Respondent) (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/2). https://icsid.worldbank.org/cases/case-database/case-detail?CaseNo=ARB(AF)/05/2
Jurdi, F. (2016). Teori Negara Hukum. Setara Press.
Lakhan, S. E., & Khurana, M. K. (2008). Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Fair Use in Education. Journal of Academic Leadership, 6(4), 1-11.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 1994 on Ratification of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1994 Number 57, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3564). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/487
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 on Copyrights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 266, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5599). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/1610
Leme, L. F. (2019). Flexibilities under Article 39.3 of the TRIPS Agreement: Protection of Pharmaceutical Test Data and the Case of Brazil. In A. d. A. Júnior, et al. (Eds.), The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Developing Country Perspective (pp. 339-355). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03263-0_22
Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a Fair Use Standard. Harvard Law Review, 103(5), 1105-1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457
Mafulah, H. (2020). Pengecualian Perjanjian yang Berkaitan Paten dan Lisensinya dalam Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.55
Mann, F. A. (1992). The Legal Aspect of Money (5th Edition). Clarendon Press.
Mappesonang, A. B. I. (2020). Peran Hak Cipta dalam Pembangunan dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(4), 238-245. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.v2i3.20117
Nainggolan, B. (2016). Komentar Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Alumni.
Purwandoko, P. H., Sulistiyono, A., & Hawin, M. (2021). The Implementation of the Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) Protection in Indonesia Based on Article 38 Law Number 28 of 2014 regarding Copyright. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 18(4), 553-569. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.4.823
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Radi, Y. (2021). International Investment Law (Textbook). UCLouvain & edX.
Riyaadhotunnisa, S., Amirulloh, M., & Yuanitasari, D. (2022). Activities of Uncertified Crypto Asset Physical Traders: A Study of Legal Protection for Investor. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.211
Sag, M. (2012). Predicting Fair Use. Ohio State Law Journal, 73(1), 47-91. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/71532
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Sardjono, A. (2010). Author’s Right is Not Only Copyright. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 7(2), 199-214.
Setiady, T. (2014). Harmonisasi Prinsip-Prinsip Trips Agreement dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dengan Kepentingan Nasional. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(4), 595-613. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no4.322
Subedi, S. P. (Ed.) (2012). Textbook International Trade and Business Law. The People’s Security Publishing House.
Suhayati, M. (2014). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Ekonomi Pemilik Hak Terkait dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 5(2), 207-221.
Sulistianingsih, D., & Prabowo, M. S. (2019). Problematik dan Karakteristik Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia. Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 166-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v12i2.3135
Supreme Court of the United States. (1983, 18 January). Sony Corporation of America, et al., Petitioners v. Universal City Studios, Inc., etc., et al. (Case Number: 81-1687). https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/1982/81-1687_01-18-1983.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (1984, 6 November). Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitioners v. Nation Enterprises and the Nation Associates, Inc. (Case Number: 83-1632). https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/1984/83-1632_11-06-1984.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (1993, 9 November). Luther R. Campbell aka Luke Skyywalker, et al., Petitioners v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (Case Number: 92-1292). https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/1993/92-1292_11-09-1993.pdf
United Nations General Assembly. (1948, 10 December). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (A/RES/217(III)[A]). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/666853/files/A_RES_217%28III%29%5EA%5E-EN.pdf?ln=en
United Nations General Assembly. (1966, 16 December). Adopted and Opened for Signature, Ratification and Accession by General Assembly: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (A/RES/2200A(XXI)). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_2200A(XXI)_civil.pdf
United Nations General Assembly. (1966, 16 December). Adopted and Opened for Signature, Ratification and Accession by General Assembly: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (A/RES/2200A(XXI)). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_2200A(XXI)_economic.pdf
United States and Mexican Claims Commission. (1926, 15 October). L. F. H. Neer and Pauline Neer (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States. https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/60-66.pdf
United States Code: Title 17 - Copyrights, Section 107 - Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use [Public Law 94-553, Approved on October 19, 1976. As Amended by Public Law 101-650; Public Law 102-492]. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2021-title17/USCODE-2021-title17-chap1-sec107
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. (1993, 20 May). American Geophysical Union, et al., Plaintiffs-Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellees, v. Texaco Inc., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Appellant. In Re Texaco Inc., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Academic Press, Inc., et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Texaco Inc., Respondent-Appellant. (Case Number: 1479, Docket 92-9341. Further Amended July 17, 1995). https://openjurist.org/60/f3d/913
Wagner, P. (2021a). Intellectual Property Law and Policy Part I (Textbook). University of Pennsylvania & edX.
Wagner, P. (2021b). Intellectual Property Law and Policy Part II (Textbook). University of Pennsylvania & edX.
Wasiati, C., & Hartanto, H. (2020). Perizinan sebagai Instrumen Pemanfaatan Hutan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 3(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v3i1.5755
Weinreb, L. L. (1990). Fair's Fair: A Comment on the Fair Use Doctrine. Harvard Law Review, 103(5), 1137-1161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341458
World Trade Organization. (1994, 15 April). Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto.pdf
World Trade Organization. (2017). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (As Amended on 23 January 2017). https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/31bis_trips_e.pdf
