The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Cybercrime: A Case Study of Online Fraud in South Sulawesi
Abstract
The escalation of cyber fraud offenses within the South Sulawesi Regional Police’s jurisdiction poses serious challenges for law enforcement authorities, particularly given the limitations of conventional regulatory instruments that fail to address the characteristics of digital crime. This research aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of law enforcement disparity triggered by the normative gap between the application of Article 378 of Law Number 1 of 1946 and Law Number 11 of 2008 and its amendments, evaluate structural and cultural obstacles distorting investigation effectiveness, and project a systemic solution through the transition to Law Number 1 of 2023. Employing a socio-legal research method with a qualitative approach, this study integrates doctrinal analysis with empirical data obtained through in-depth interviews with investigators, judges, and victims. The results reveal crucial facts regarding regulatory disharmony, where law enforcement officials experience inertia in exercising their authority to cut off digital access due to unprepared forensic infrastructure at the regional level and low public legal literacy. This phenomenon creates a paradox of blunt law enforcement and perpetuates disparities in court verdicts. In conclusion, this study asserts that partial reform is no longer adequate to address the complexity of cybercrime. The study’s implications include concrete steps, such as formulating standard operating procedures aligned with Article 493 of Law Number 1 of 2023, forensic laboratory decentralization, and adopting internet access rights revocation sanctions as a futuristic sentencing strategy that guarantees legal certainty and restorative justice.
Downloads
References
A’Raaf, F. A., Rahman, S., & Badaru, B. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Korban Penipuan Jual Beli Mobil Melalui Aplikasi Facebook. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(1), 253-268. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article/view/1678
Adrianto, A., Thalib, H., & Ilyas, M. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1445-1457. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1946
Akbar, M. A., Kamal, M., & Badaru, B. (2024). Efektivitas Peran Kepolisan Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online di Dunia Maya. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 877-893. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1867
Alamsyah, F. R., Cameron, C., Ridwan, P., Yustisia, M. T., Romadhon, M. R. R., & Yusuf, N. T. (2023). Problems in the Application of Law in the Indra Kenz Fraudulent Investment Case. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v4i1.67847
Amirullah, S., & Sodikin, S. (2026). The Principle of Legality vs. Digital Sentencing Innovation: The Dialectics of Revocation of Internet Access Rights as a Criminal Penalty in Cybercrime Cases. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 1078-1096. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.553
Ekawati, D., Herdiana, D., & Haryanti, A. (2025). Phishing in the Banking Sector: Between Cybercrime and Consumer Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.422
Gadjong, A. A. (2023). The Agreement of Personal Shopping Service through E-Commerce Platforms: A Case Study of Consumer Protection. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.230
Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2020). Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi oleh Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 314-323. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.314-323
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Kharisma, D. B., & Ar, N. T. E. (2022). Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative Model for Dispute Settlement in the Financial Technology Sector. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 17(1), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.25267
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2008 Number 58, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4843). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/138
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 on Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 251, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5952). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1683
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2024 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6905). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1842
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2025 Number 188, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7149). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/2011
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edition). Sage. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ
Nur, T., & Panggabean, R. R. (2021). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Payment Method among Generation Z: The Extended UTAUT Approach. Journal of Accounting Research Organization and Economics, 4(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v4i1.19644
Nuraksari, Y., Thalib, H., & Salle, S. (2024). Efektivitas Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Travel Umrah. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(2), 745-762. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article/view/1852
Oktana, R., Akub, S., & Maskun, M. (2023). Social Media in the Process of Evidence of Electronic Information and Transaction Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252
Opit, S. E., & Frans, M. P. (2025). Proving Securities Trading Fraud in Capital Market Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.413
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=TAQHEAAAQBAJ
Rafique, R. B., & Venugopal, V. (2021). Preventive Measures to Mitigate the Risk of Fraud in Letters of Credit Transactions in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.12.1.2021.7882
Rahmawati, N. D. (2024). Law Enforcement against Online Arisan Fraud Perpetrators Who Conduct Fictitious Arisan Auctions (Case Study of Sukoharjo Police Station Cases). Serunai, 2(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.63019/serunai.v2i2.54
Rauf, A., Rahman, S., & Razak, A. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Media Elektronik. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(1), 77-93. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1624
Ruslan, Z. (2022). Letter of Credit: Uniform Custom Practice dan Fraud dalam Perdagangan Internasional. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, 10(2), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v10i2.118
Sakina, P. (2025, October 15). Komdigi: Keamanan Ekosistem E-commerce Jadi Tanggung Jawab Bersama. Antara. Retrieved November 22, 2025, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5176273/komdigi-keamanan-ekosistem-e-commerce-jadi-tanggung-jawab-bersama
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Sihombing, R. P., Kusno, K., & Siregar, A. A. (2024). Investigative Effectiveness in the Digital Era: A Case Study of Technological Innovation at the Rokan Hilir Police Resort. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.368
Sukadana, I. M., Amiruddin, A., & Parman, L. (2018). Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi Mahkota dalam Perkara Pidana Pencurian. Law Reform, 14(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20873
Triananda, R. K., Razak, A., & Mappaselleng, N. F. (2024). Efektivitas Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Online. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 471-486. Retrieved from https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1808
Zuvarcan, D. A., Yuspin, W., & Budiono, A. (2025). Qualitative Study of Fraud in Health Services and Legal Framework in Indonesia: A Literature Review. Diponegoro Law Review, 10(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.42-53
Copyright (c) 2026 Zulfan Akbar Syahfallah, Askari Razak, Salle Salle

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














