The Panel of Judges’ Rationale for the Annulment of a Land Grant Deed Due to an Unlawful Act by the Inheritor: A Case Study of Decision Number 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn

  • Eriska Desianti Dewi Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia
  • Tetti Samosir Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia
  • Indah Harlina Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia

Abstract

Disputes concerning the annulment of land grant deeds between Inheritors constitute a complex issue within civil and agrarian law, requiring an in-depth understanding of the rationale behind court decisions. This research aims to analyze the rationale of the Panel of Judges of the Kepanjen District Court in Decision Number 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn regarding the annulment of Grant Deed Number 167/KEP-35.10/IX/2020. Employing a normative legal research method with a case study approach, the qualitative analysis focused on the legal considerations (ratio decidendi) within the decision. The analysis results indicate the Panel of Judges’ rationale was primarily based on the assessment of evidence corroborating the Plaintiff’s pre-grant proper claim derived from an oral transaction, setting aside the formal strength of the authentic deed due to the Defendant’s absence of rebuttal evidence. The juridical annulment of the deed was grounded in the direct application of the Nemo dat quod non habet principle, referenced through Article 210 section (2) of the Compilation of Islamic Law because the Grantor was proven to have granted part of the object that was not his right. The qualification of unlawful act against the Defendant was determined as a logical consequence of this finding, albeit without in-depth elaboration of the elements, demonstrating pragmatic reasoning. In conclusion, the judicial rationale, in this case, tends to prioritize substantive justice over formal legal certainty, yet it raises discourse concerning evidentiary standards and potential issues of inheritance law coherence that remain unaddressed.

Keywords: Dispute, Grant Deed Annulment, Inheritor, Panel of Judges’ Rationale, Unlawful Act

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriyani, S., Wahyuningsih, W., & Irfan, M. (2021). Konsep dan Pengaturan Ligitime Portie dalam Pewarisan Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jatiswara, 36(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v36i1.283

Apriani, D., & Bur, A. (2021). Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum dalam Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 5(2), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.11

Ardhita, B. C. K., & Yunanto, Y. (2023). Juridical Analysis of the Implementation of Notary Public’s Authority in Making Deeds Related to the Land Sector. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.298

Budify, A., Manurung, J. A. L., & Harianja, S. B. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Hibah di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.77

Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail

Decision of the District Court of Kepanjen Number 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn on Supriyono v. Sugeng Raharjo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaef2eac64ed58e88f10303932353433.html

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1997 Number 59, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3696). https://peraturan.go.id/id/pp-no-24-tahun-1997

Hamzah, Y. A., & Mangarengi, A. A. (2023). The Authority of PPAT in Making AJB Related to Heritage Land Owned by a Minor. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 364-375. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.253

Heryawan, A., Franciska, W., & Syakura, F. P. (2023). Requirement of Legal Protection for Rights P I as a Form of Liability for Notary Negligence in Making Authentic Deeds. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 4(7), 66-74. Retrieved from https://scholarzest.com/index.php/ejrds/article/view/3732

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Jakfar, T. M., Achyar, G., & Rizqy, D. F. (2022). Dampak Penundaan Pembagian Harta Warisan di Kecamatan Kota Jantho Kabupaten Aceh Besar. El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law, 2(2), 110-128. https://doi.org/10.22373/hadhanah.v2i2.1835

Kaunang, J. D., & Harlina, I. (2024). Kepastian Hukum atas Peralihan Hak atau Balik Nama Sertipikat Tanpa Hadirnya Pihak Penjual. Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(1), 29-55. Retrieved from https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/otentik/article/view/5942

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Provisions of Agrarian Principles (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 104, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2043). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1361

Nasrulloh, A. M. (2024). Tinjauan Asas Keadilan, Kepastian dan Kemanfaatan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan pada Putusan Hakim Nomor 3116/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Smdg. Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 8(2), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.21093/qj.v8i2.9044

Nuraini, L., & Yunanto, Y. (2023). Transfer of Land Rights through Court Decisions: Juridical Implications and Challenges in Implementation. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.265

Piyerda, P. O., & Yahya, T. (2020). Pelaksanaan Hibah pada Masyarakat Melayu Jambi di Desa Merlung. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 1(3), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v1i3.9981

Putri, A. A. J. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Ahli Waris yang Dirugikan atas Akta Hibah yang Dibuat Secara Melawan Hukum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1298 K/Pdt/2019). Indonesian Notary, 4(1), 1-28. Retrieved from https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss1/18

Putri, D. A. M., & Silviana, A. (2022). The Transfer of Land Rights through Oral Grants: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.176

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Riyadi, R., & Zumrotun, S. (2022). Hibah Sebagai strategi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Waris di Indonesia. ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 4(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v4i1.129

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Sari, K. I. (2024). Pembatalan Akta Hibah PPAT kepada Anak Angkat tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris (Studi Kasus Putusan MA No. 1818K/Pdt/2008). Jurnal Akta Notaris, 3(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v3i1.1680

Seruni, P., Harlina, I., & Barus, Z. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pihak yang Dirugikan Akibat Pemalsuan Akta Otentik oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 466/Pid.B/2023/PN Jkt.Sel). Hukum Dinamika Ekselensia, 7(1), 219-236. Retrieved from https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/hde/article/view/4766

Solekan, D. S., & Samosir, T. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Mengenai Kuasa Menjual yang di Anggap sebagai Kuasa Mutlak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3306 K/Pdt/2018). Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan Imanot, 2(1), 184-225. Retrieved from https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/imanot/article/view/4446

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Compilation of Islamic Law. https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/resource/ebook/23.pdf

Susanto, I., & Samosir, T. (2023). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Ahli Waris dalam Peningkatan Hak Guna Bangunan Berdasarkan Akta Hibah. Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan Imanot, 3(1), 196-214. Retrieved from https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/imanot/article/view/4989

Syam, M. R. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2022). Status and Position of the SHM of Condominium Units after a Fire: Makassar Mall Shopping Center. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.218

Syam’ani, N. I., & Setiawan, I. K. O. (2025). Denial of an Application for Annulment of a Deed of Sale Due to Subjective Defect: A Case Study of Decision Number 32/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kpn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.419

Vicky, V., Samosir, T., & Harlina, I. (2024). Akibat Hukum bagi Notaris yang Tidak Saksama dalam Pembuatan Akta Kuasa Menjual (Studi Kasus Putusan No 20PK/Pid/2020). Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 10(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v10i2.2737

Winandra, M., & Samosir, T. (2023). Pembatalan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa dalam Jual Beli Bidang Tanah yang Sah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2022). Negara dan Keadilan, 12(2), 163-185. Retrieved from https://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/negkea/article/view/21231

Published
2025-04-22
How to Cite
Dewi, E. D., Samosir, T., & Harlina, I. (2025). The Panel of Judges’ Rationale for the Annulment of a Land Grant Deed Due to an Unlawful Act by the Inheritor: A Case Study of Decision Number 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 92-111. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.423