The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Regarding the Criminal Offense of Receiving Stolen Laptops in Makassar City

  • Jumaris Jumaris Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
  • La Ode Husen Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Azwad Rachmat Hambali Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

The persistent criminal offense of receiving stolen laptops poses a significant challenge to the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement against this offence in Makassar City and comprehensively identify and analyze the factors that influence it. The method employed is empirical legal research conducted in Makassar City, involving primary data collection through administering questionnaires to 25 respondents and in-depth interviews with key informants, supplemented by secondary data from a documentary study. Data analysis integrates descriptive quantitative and interpretive qualitative approaches guided by the theoretical framework of legal effectiveness. The primary results of the study convergently indicate that the effectiveness of law enforcement regarding the criminal offense of receiving stolen laptops in Makassar City is generally assessed as less effective, as reflected in the majority perception of respondents and qualitative indicators such as the persistence of perpetrators and the weak deterrent effect of criminal sanctions. Factor analysis identifies several significant determinants contributing to this condition, including limited preventive capacity within the legal structure, low public legal awareness and caution in second-hand goods transactions, the presence of substantial operational constraints in the investigation process, and the dynamics of cooperation between perpetrators of theft and receivers which strengthen criminal resilience. It is concluded that the low effectiveness of law enforcement is the result of the complex interaction of these structural, cultural, operational, and criminal environment factors.

Keywords: Determining Factors, Laptop Theft, Law Enforcement Effectiveness, Receiving Stolen Goods

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aulia, A., Doorson, S., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum atas Tindak Pidana Penadahan (Fokus pada Pengaturan, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, dan Penyelesaian Berprinsip Restorative Justice di Indonesia). Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 2(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v2i1.210

Busthami, D. S. (2022). The Principles of Good Legislation Forming: A Critical Review. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.223

Hajairin, H. (2020). Praktik Penadahan Hasil Pencurian Sepeda Motor di Kabupaten Bima. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 3(2), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v3i2.217

Hambali, A. R. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana. Kalabbirang Law Journal, 2(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang36

Husen, L. O., Salle, S., Syalman, A. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2020). Pengamanan Intelijen Kepolisian Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Atas Objek Sengketa. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.62

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Kelana, N. M., & Seregig, I. K. (2025). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penadahan Barang Hasil Curian (Studi Putusan Nomor 382/Pid.B/2024/PN Tjk). Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 6749-6757. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i1.17729

Kholil, M. (2018). Tinjauan Empiris Pasal 480 KUHP tentang Penadahan Menyangkut Hak-Hak Konsumen dalam Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v0i0.1756

Kurniadi, A. R. (2022). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penadahan yang Berhubugan dengan Tindak Pidana Pencurian. Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 12(1), 63-98. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v12i1.2060

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1357

Lestiyana, L., & Sudarti, E. (2020). Putusan tentang Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan. Pampas: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8372

Presdianto, D. D. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Sindikat Penadah Sepeda Motor Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Analisis Putusan Nomor 767/Pid.B/2022/PN Lbp) [Master Thesis, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara]. Institutional Repository UISU. https://repository.uisu.ac.id/handle/123456789/3415

Qamar, N. (2021). Theory Position in the Structure of Legal Science. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.126

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rochman, F., Husen, L. O., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Efektivitas Fungsi Kepolisian dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 76-92. Retrieved from https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoCL/article/view/430

Rosadi, M. F. (2023). Penerapan Asas Kesalahan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Waingapu [Master Thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung]. Unissula Institutional Repository. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/30865

Rudiyanto, R., Zeinudin, M., & Fithry, A. (2023). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penadahan dengan Prinsip Restorative Justice dalam Tahap Penyidikan. Jurnal Jendela Hukum, 10(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.24929/jjh.v10i2.2979

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Saputra, P. F., Baharudin, B., & Anggalana, A. (2022). Implementasi Sanksi terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan Kendaraan Bermotor. Res Judicata, 2(1), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v2i1.31

Setiawan, D. A. (2024). Strategi Penanggulangan Kejahatan Ekonomi Berbasis Teknologi: Studi Komparatif antara Indonesia, Amerika, dan Eropa. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 53(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.1.2024.78-89

Siregar, A. A., Kadaryanto, B., & Harahap, I. (2024). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Penadahan Barang Hasil Curian di Polres Rokan Hilir Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris, 8(2), 414-426. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i2.1369

Siregar, A. G. T., Siregar, S. A., & Nasution, M. Y. (2021). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Memanen dan atau Memungut serta Menadah Hasil Perkebunan Secara Tidak Sah pada Perusahaan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Wilayah Hukum Polres Langkat. Jurnal Retentum, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v3i1.897

Soekanto, S. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soplantila, R. (2024, January 18). Komplotan Pembobol 2 Kantor Kelurahan di Makassar Ditangkap. Detik Sulsel. Retrieved February 18, 2025, from https://www.detik.com/sulsel/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7148234/komplotan-pembobol-2-kantor-kelurahan-di-makassar-ditangkap

Zainuddin, Z. (2022). The Legal Due Diligence of Land Acquisition for the Public Interest: A Critical Review. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.159

Published
2025-04-18
How to Cite
Jumaris, J., Husen, L. O., & Hambali, A. R. (2025). The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Regarding the Criminal Offense of Receiving Stolen Laptops in Makassar City. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.421