Justice Collaborator at a Legal Crossroads: An Analysis of the Tension between Substantive Justice and Legal Certainty
Abstract
This research examines the tension between substantive justice and legal certainty within the Indonesian criminal justice system, which arises from the legal ambiguity surrounding the Justice Collaborator. The case study focuses on the Justice Collaborator verdict in the premeditated murder case involving Irjen FS. Utilizing a normative juridical research method through statute, case, and conceptual approaches, this study aims to analyze how the legal vacuum regarding the Justice Collaborator in the Penal Code is addressed through judicial adaptation. The findings indicate that the Panel of Judges constructed a “parallel penal track” to grant a reward to Bharada E as the Justice Collaborator. This track refers to sectoral legal instruments such as Law Number 13 of 2006 and Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2011. Although this practice successfully realized substantive justice, it inherently creates a systemic implication in the form of tension between judicial discretion and the principle of legal certainty, a pillar of the civil law system. It is concluded that the absence of a codified norm for the Justice Collaborator potentially threatens the consistency and predictability of criminal law, which, if not promptly addressed through reform, could risk the systemic delegitimization of the criminal justice system in the future. Therefore, this research recommends the urgent need for a comprehensive codification of the Justice Collaborator doctrine into the Penal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 to align the needs of law enforcement with the maintenance of the principle of legality.
Downloads
References
Armelia, D., Rosikhu, M., & Rahmatyar, A. (2024). Analysis of Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Premeditated Murder: An Analysis of Decision Number 813K/Pid/2023. Ex Aequo et Bono Journal of Law, 2(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v2i1.2024.1040
Azzahra, A. N. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Verstek, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i1.64160
Behuku, J. G., Kusuma, J. I., Chasanah, N. U., Sugianto, F., & Indradewi, A. A. (2025). A The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464
Circular of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2011 on the Treatment of Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborators in Certain Criminal Cases. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/sema-nomor-4-tahun-2011/detail
Decision of the District Court of South Jakarta Number 796/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel on Defendant: Ferdy Sambo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb645ac0ce0f89305303932333037.html
Decision of the District Court of South Jakarta Number 797/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel on Defendant: Putri Candrawathi. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb64596a99f80a948303932323331.html
Decision of the District Court of South Jakarta Number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel on Defendant: Richard Eliezer Pudihang Lumiu. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb3e4e825b17ca6c9303834353234.html
Decision of the District Court of South Jakarta Number 799/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel on Defendant: Ricky Rizal Wibowo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb6459a05b16ebfdb303932323337.html
Decision of the District Court of South Jakarta Number 800/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Sel on Defendant: Kuat Ma’ruf. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb6459d540c76b4fe303932323432.html
Decision of the High Court of DKI Jakarta Number 53/Pid/2023/PT DKI on Defendant: Ferdy Sambo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedda8ab099590889e3313330373532.html
Decision of the High Court of DKI Jakarta Number 54/Pid/2023/PT DKI on Defendant: Putri Candrawathi. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedd9e44b82da86c079313731363436.html
Decision of the High Court of DKI Jakarta Number 55/Pid/2023/PT DKI on Defendant: Ricky Rizal Wibowo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedda4be3b44e54b1a1303533383139.html
Decision of the High Court of DKI Jakarta Number 56/Pid/2023/PT DKI on Defendant: Kuat Ma’ruf. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedd9b0fe19b618961b313130323232.html
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 813 K/Pid/2023 on Defendant: Ferdy Sambo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee455b5b243ef29e1d313132383336.html
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 814 K/Pid/2023 on Defendant: Ricky Rizal Wibowo. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee455b6ca8f762bf45313132393036.html
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 815 K/Pid/2023 on Defendant: Kuat Ma’ruf. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee455b632b2cc8bdac313132383530.html
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 816 K/Pid/2023 on Defendant: Putri Candrawathi. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee455b6842d238928b313132383538.html
Hutabarat, R. R. (2024). Criminal Sanction Reduction Policy: Mental and Intellectual Disabilities Review from the Purpose of Punishment. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 24(1), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.1.4148
Inggria, D., Bella, W. G. O., Laila, I. P., & Aprilia, D. R. (2025). Analisis Pembuktian Unsur Berencana dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan yang Dilatarbelakangi Hubungan Gelap Pada Kasus Pembunuhan di Wonogiri. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.1057
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. (2023, January 30). Amicus Curiae: Kejujuran Hati Harus Dihargai. https://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Amicus-Curiae-JC-Richard-1.pdf
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Jannah, I. A. (2024). Analisis Perbuatan Obstruction of Justice & Penyelewangan Nilai Pancasila yang Dilakukan Aparat Kepolisian: Studi Kasus Ferdi Sambo & Brigadir J. The Republic: Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.55352/htn.v2i1.870
Jardan, G., & Khairani, K. (2024). Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pengaturan Justice Collaborator di Indonesia. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.485
Kaemirawati, D. T., & Hidayah, B. (2025). Pengaruh Vonis Bebas Ronald Tannur dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Publik. Binamulia Hukum, 14(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v14i1.941
Kurniawan, R. A., Felisiano, I., & Astutik, A. (2023). Penafsiran Victim Precipitation Untuk Pemidanaan Kekerasan Seksual. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 52(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.52.1.2023.86-96
Kusumaatmadja, M. (2011). Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan. PT. Alumni.
Laia, F. F. D. (2024). The Urgency of Enacting Government Regulation on Community Service Sentence in Indonesian under the New Penal Code. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i1.350
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/814
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/755
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2006 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2006 Number 64, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4635). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/69
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 2014 on Amendment to Law Number 13 of 2006 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 64, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4635). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1613
Nasution, R., Zulfikar, M., & Ihsan, N. (2023, February 17). Bharada E Case - Judges Comprehend Justice Collaborator Rights: LPSK. Antara. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://en.antaranews.com/amp/news/273072/bharada-e-case-judges-comprehend-justice-collaborator-rights-lpsk
Nufus, W. H. (2023, January 25). Pengacara: Eliezer Patuhi ‘Woy Kau Tembak’ karena Sambo Berseragam. Detik News. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6534666/pengacara-eliezer-patuhi-woy-kau-tembak-karena-sambo-berseragam
Pratama, W. A. (2019). Penegakan Hukuman Mati terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Safitri, E. (2022, October 17). Perjalanan Kasus Pembunuhan Brigadir J hingga Ferdy Sambo dkk Disidangkan. Detik News. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6351835/perjalanan-kasus-pembunuhan-brigadir-j-hingga-ferdy-sambo-dkk-disidangkan
Sahbani, A. (2023, February 2). LPSK Kritisi Penerapan Justice Collaborator dalam Tuntutan Richard Eliezer. Hukumonline. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lpsk-kritisi-penerapan-justice-collaborator-dalam-tuntutan-richard-eliezer-lt63db607d4151b
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Septian, A. R., & Mudiparwanto, W. A. (2023). Justice Collaborator Bagi Tersangka Bharada E dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Brigadir J. Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 6(2), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v6i2.3147
Sinaga, Y. A., & Ayudiana, S. (2023, February 15). Eliezer Deserves to be Granted Justice Collaborator Status: Judge. Antara. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://en.antaranews.com/news/272853/eliezer-deserves-to-be-granted-justice-collaborator-status-judge
Siswanto, H., & Nainggolan, I. L. (2023). Paradigma Konstruktivisme dalam Penegakan Hukum Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana oleh Ferdy Sambo. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 9(2), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.31599/75y8y598
Surahman, D. A. F., Hamzani, A. I., & Rizkianto, K. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pada Kasus Obstruction of Justice. Social, Educational, Learning and Language, 2(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://jurnal.sitasi.id/sell/article/view/78
Toisuta, C., Salsabila, D., Walean, J. J., & Hosnah, A. U. (2023). Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana dalam Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i1.680
Vervaele, J. A. E. (2009). Special Procedural Measures and the Protection of Human Rights: General Report. Utrecht Law Review, 5(2), 66-103. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.103
Wie, C. (2024). Jalan Tengah Indonesia Menuju Penghapusan Pidana Mati. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 54(4), 847-870. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.1701
Wijaya, M. H. (2021). Weaknesses of Judges Thinking in Civil Law Systems. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 4(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.4.1.1834.39-44
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizqy Adi Firmansyah, Matthew Widjaja, Cesilia Elok Kusumawardani, Fajar Sugianto, Astrid Athina Indradewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
