Implementation of Capital Punishment in Indonesia Based on Humanity, Ethics, and Morality Aspects: A Utilitarian Justice Perspective

  • Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Rodliyah Rodliyah Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Rina Khairani Pancaningrum Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

Abstract

The implementation of capital punishment stipulated in Law Number 2/PNPS/1964 is clearly contrary to the second principle of Pancasila, the noble values enshrined in the 1945 Constitution, and the mandates of international conventions, thereby causing a legal antinomy or conflict of norms. This study employs normative legal research methods to identify legal rules, principles, and doctrines that address the legal issues encountered while utilising a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach. Research results show the implementation of capital punishment policy should not be solely for the purpose of retribution but should also be based on humanitarian considerations, as stated in the second principle of Pancasila. For example, lethal injection is often considered more humane than other methods of execution. From a utilitarian perspective, this method is acceptable if it provides maximum benefit to society by reducing the suffering of the perpetrator (convicted person). Capital punishment by lethal injection, which has been used in several countries, including China, Thailand, and Vietnam, is considered more humane and upholds ethical and moral values, so lethal injection can be considered as an option for the method of capital punishment in Indonesia to replace the method of execution by firing squad.

Keywords: Capital Punishment, Human Rights, Lethal Injection, Penal Code, Utilitarian Justice

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang-dasar

Abidin, Z., & Eddyono, S. W. (Eds.). (2017). Politik Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.

Achmad, A. T. D. (2025, April 9). Hukuman Mati Hanya untuk ‘Kejahatan Paling Serius’. Hukumonline. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hukuman-mati-hanya-untuk-kejahatan-paling-serius-lt67f5e63356581/?page=all

Achmad, R. (2013). Hakekat Keberadaan Sanksi Pidana dan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 79-104. Retrieved from https://legalitas.unbari.ac.id/index.php/Legalitas/article/view/98

Ali, A. (2008). Menguak Realitas Hukum: Rampai Kolom & Artikel Pilihan dalam Bidang Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Amnesty International Indonesia. (2025, 8 April). Eksekusi Mati Global Cetak Rekor, Vonis Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Terus Bertambah. https://www.amnesty.id/kabar-terbaru/siaran-pers/eksekusi-mati-global-cetak-rekor-vonis-hukuman-mati-di-indonesia-terus-bertambah/04/2025

Anh, N. T. B. (2023). Comparison of the Death Penalty between Vietnam and Certain Countries in the World. Lex Humana, 15(1), 436-453. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2464

Ardiansyah, D., Adiaat, M., Cahyani, A. I., & Rahmawati, N. (2024). Eksistensi Hukuman Pidana Mati dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Rampai Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.35473/rjh.v3i1.3005

Arief, B. N. (2017). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Assegaf, J. S. (2016, July 30). Hukuman Mati: Setelah Dieksekusi, Terpidana Tak Seketika Mati. Espos Indonesia. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://news.espos.id/hukuman-mati-setelah-dieksekusi-terpidana-tak-seketika-mati-741171

Asshiddiqie, J. (2009). Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sinar Grafika.

Azzahra, N. (2025, April 8). Amnesty International Indonesia Desak Pemerintah Tunda Semua Eksekusi Mati. Tempo. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://www.tempo.co/hukum/amnesty-international-indonesia-desak-pemerintah-tunda-semua-eksekusi-mati-1228560

Bentham, J. (1876). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon Press.

Christianto, H. (2009). Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati bagi Terpidana Mati dalam Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(1), 25-38.

Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21/PUU-VI/2008 on the Judicial Review of Law Number 2/PNPS/1964. https://tracking.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.TrackPerkara&id=21/PUU-VI/2008

Denno, D. W. (2025, February 19). Lethal Injection Capital Punishment. Britannica. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/lethal-injection

Dimyati, K., Absori, A., Wardiono, K., & Hamdani, F. (2017). Hukum & Moral: Basis Epistemologi Paradigma Rasional H.L.A. Hart. Genta Publishing.

Eddyono, S. W., Napitupulu, E. A. T., & Kamilah, A. G. (2015). Hukuman Mati dalam RKUHP: Jalan Tengah yang Meragukan. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.

Endryan, C., & Hadjar, A. F. (2024). Analisis Komparasi Prosedur Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati Indonesia dan Thailand. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 6(2), 779-790. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i2.19226

Fariduddin, A. M., & Tetono, N. Y. D. (2022). Imposition of the Death Penalty for Corruptors in Indonesia from a Utilitarian Perspective. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.903

Frasher, D. W. (1993). Quieting the Controversy: A Rule Utilitarian Solution to the Capital Punishment Dilemma. San Diego Justice Journal, 1(2), 365-402. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/quieting-controversy-rule-utilitarian-solution-capital-punishment

Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) dalam Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Hariyono, H., Nugroho, I., Atmadja, I. G., Wahyudi, W., Sukriono, D., Sirajuddin, S., Ibrahim, A., Pratiwi, C. S., Sulardi, S., Prianto, A., Winardi, W., Alfian, M. A., Zuhry, A. D., Fatkhurman, F., Hakim, L., Putro, W. D., Anwar, A., Hamidi, J., Lutfi, M., Kurniawan, L. J., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2013). Membangun Negara Hukum yang Bermartabat. Setara Press.

Heriyono, H. (2020). Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati dalam Persepektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2636

Hikmah, H., & Sopoyono, E. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Mati terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.78-92

Husni, L. (2015). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Iustitia, Z. C., & Kirana, G. C. (2025). Perbandingan Pengaturan Eksekusi Pidana Mati di Indonesia dan Vietnam. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 7(1), 421-432. Retrieved from https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/refor/article/view/22330

Johnson, D. T., & Zimring, F. E. (2009). Death Penalty Lessons from Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal, 7(39), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1557466009008699

Kant, I. (1887). The Philosophy of Law: An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right (Trans. by W. Hastie). T. & T. Clark.

Kant, I. (1965). The Metaphysical Elements of Justice (Trans. by J. Ladd). Bobbs-Merrill Company.

Kim, A. (2015). Human Rights Policy: The Cases of Capital Punishment in Kyrgyzstan and South Korea. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(4), 362-367. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2015.v5.481

Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. (2009). Komentar Umum: Kovenan Internasional Hak Sipil dan Politik; Kovenan Internasional Hak Ekonomi Sosial dan Budaya. https://www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/publikasi/2010/05/01/41/komentar-umum-kovenan-internasional-hak-sipil-politik-ekonomi-sosial-budaya.html

Kusumo, A. T. S. (2015). Hukuman Mati Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional. Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat.

Laia, F. F. D. (2024). The Urgency of Enacting Government Regulation on Community Service Sentence in Indonesian under the New Penal Code. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i1.350

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1969 on the Declaration of Various Presidential Determinations and Presidential Regulations as Laws (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1969 Number 36, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2900). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1536

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3886). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/440

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang/detail/1818

Lubis, T. M., & Lay, A. (2009). Kontroversi Hukuman Mati: Perbedaan Pendapat Hakim Konstitusi. Kompas.

Mangesti, Y. A., & Tanya, B. L. (2014). Moralitas Hukum. Genta Publishing.

Manti, R., Badu, L. W., & Puluhulawa, J. (2024). Kedudukan Suntik Mati Terhadap Terpidana Mati dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(1), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1704

Marbun, A. N. (2020). Konsep Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. MaPPI FHUI.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mayer, J. E. (2016). Ameliorating Lethal Injection by Using Bispectral Index Monitoring of Inmates to Help Ensure a More Humane Death. Hofstra Law Review, 45(2), 499-514. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol45/iss2/9

Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.

Morris, J. F. (2023). St. Thomas Aquinas on Capital Punishment: Correcting Aquinas with Aquinas. In European Studies Conference Selected Proceedings (2023) (pp. 1-9). University of Nebraska Omaha. Retrieved from https://www.unomaha.edu/college-of-arts-and-sciences/european-studies-conference/esc-proceedings/index.php

Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2019). Utilitarian Traits and the Janus-Headed Model: Origins, Meaning, and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3592-5

Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Muladi, M. (2002). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. PT. Alumni.

Nurhadiyanto, L. (2018). Replacement Discourse Daftar Tunggu Terpidana Mati (Death Row) dalam Perspektif Penologi Konstitutif di Indonesia. Deviance: Jurnal Kriminologi, 2(2), 117-138. Retrieved from https://journal.budiluhur.ac.id/deviance/article/view/914

Nurjamal, E. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana dan Penerapan Hukum Acara Pidana: Dilengkapi UU KUHP Baru. Edu Publisher.

Octavia, S., & Setuningsih, N. (2025, April 8). Vonis Hukuman Mati di Indonesia, di Tengah Pemulangan WNA Terpidana Mati. Kompas.com. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/04/08/17105121/vonis-hukuman-mati-di-indonesia-di-tengah-pemulangan-wna-terpidana-mati

Panani, S. Y. P. (2015). Eksekusi Hukuman Mati dalam Perspektif Etika Utilitarianisme (Relevansinya dengan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia) [Master Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Repository UGM. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/92239

Pane, M. D., & Pudjiastuti, D. (2021). Pidana Mati di Indonesia (Teori, Regulasi, dan Aplikasi). Pustaka Aksara.

Prakoso, D., & Nirwanto, D. A. (1984). Euthanasia: Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Pratama, W. A. (2019). Penegakan Hukuman Mati terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34

Presidential Determination of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 1964 on the Procedures for Capital Punishment Execution Imposed by Courts within the General and Military Jurisdictions (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1964 Number 38). https://peraturan.go.id/id/penpres-no-2-tahun-1964

Putra, A. A. (2025). The Politics of Law Regarding Capital Punishment and the Protection of the Right to Life in Indonesia: A Perspective from Law Number 1 of 2023. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.429

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rhiti, H. (2011). Filsafat Hukum Edisi Lengkap: Dari Klasik sampai Postmodernisme. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Rochim, R. D. N. R., Navianto, I., & Endrawati, L. (2014). Harmonisasi Norma-Norma dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan tentang Kebebasan Hakim. Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 1-27. Retrieved from https://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/848

Rodliyah, R. (2014). Pidana Mati Terhadap Perempuan (Suatu Kajian Perbandingan). Arti Bumi Intaran.

Shafira, M., Achmad, D., Tamza, F. B., & Ghiffary, M. H. (2022). Hukum Pemasyarakatan dan Penitensier. Pusaka Media.

Sidharta, B. A. (2005, December 7). Analisis Filosofikal Terhadap Hukuman Mati di Indonesia [Workshop Presentation]. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia, Bandung, Indonesia.

Subarkah, T., & Sumantri, A. (2025, April 8). Indonesia Masih Jatuhkan Vonis Mati di Tengah Penurunan Tren Global. Metro TV. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/K5nC70D7-indonesia-masih-jatuhkan-vonis-mati-di-tengah-penurunan-tren-global

Suratman, S., & Dillah, P. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Dilengkapi Tata Cara & Contoh Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Bidang Hukum. Alfabeta.

Tangkau, H. C. (2011). Karya Tulis Ilmiah: Pidana Mati dalam Pergolakan Pemikiran. Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Tran, K., & Vu, C. G. (2019). The Changing Nature of Death Penalty in Vietnam: A Historical and Legal Inquiry. Societies, 9(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9030056

Tucker, E. W. (1966). Kant: The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Michigan Law Review, 65(2), 406-414. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol65/iss2/14

Udoudom, M. D., Bassey, S. A., Okpe, O., & Adie, T. (2019). Kantian and Utilitarian Ethics on Capital Punishment. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), 2(2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i2.234

United Nations General Assembly. (1966, 16 December). Resolutions Adopted on the Reports of the Third Committee: 2200(XXI). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (A/RES/2200(XXI)[A]). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/660187/files/A_RES_2200%28XXI%29%5EA%5E-EN.pdf?ln=en

Waagstein, P. R. (2023). Unpacking Dignity for Death Row Inmates in Southeast Asia. In S. Petcharamesree et al. (Eds.), Unpacking the Death Penalty in ASEAN (pp. 65-83). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_4

Walsh, A., & Hatch, V. L. (2018). Capital Punishment, Retribution, and Emotion: An Evolutionary Perspective. New Criminal Law Review, 21(2), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2018.21.2.267

Widnyana, I. M. (1993). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Adat. Eresco.

Wijaya, R. K. (2024). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Eksekusi Pidana Mati yang Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Pancasila [Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. Unissula Repository. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/33477

Published
2025-05-24
How to Cite
Ishwara, A. S. S., Rodliyah, R., & Pancaningrum, R. K. (2025). Implementation of Capital Punishment in Indonesia Based on Humanity, Ethics, and Morality Aspects: A Utilitarian Justice Perspective. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.435