Restorative Justice and Living Law Based on Dayak Ngaju Adat Law: A Comprehensive Analysis

  • Filpan Fajar Dermawan Laia Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Abstract

This article aims to explain the importance of the restorative justice concept in Indonesia. It analyses the implementation of this concept under the Indonesian criminal procedural law and the Dayak Ngaju Adat Law. The following analysis gathers legal doctrines concerning restorative justice, the Indonesian criminal procedural code concerning prosecution, and the Dayak Ngaju Adat Law cases. From the first discussion of this article, it can be understood that restorative justice is a concept that upholds reparation and a win-win solution for the victim and the offender. This concept is constituted under Article 139 of Law Number 8 of 1981 and the Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The second discussion indicates that this practice is also well recognized under the Dayak Ngaju Adat Law. This Indigenous community implements the Tumbang Anoi Peace Agreement, an adat law that upholds the reparation concept and the win-win solution in solving criminal issues. Last but not least, from the third discussion, this article arrives at a recommendation where restorative justice shall be preserved and enhanced under both the Indonesian positive law and the living law. This is because restorative justice is in line with the Pancasila or the Indonesian five principles which are the main sources of the Indonesian law.

Keywords: Attorney General, Dayak Ngaju, Penal Mediation, Restorative Justice

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uud-1945

Ali, M., Muliyono, A., Sanjaya, W., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Compensation and Restitution for Victims of Crime in Indonesia: Regulatory Flaws, Judicial Response, and Proposed Solution. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2069910

Annisa, F., & Saini, Y. (2022). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. LPPM Universitas Bung Hatta.

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804618

Darwin, I. P. J. (2019). Implications of Overcapacity for Correctional Institutions in Indonesia. Cepalo, 3(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1847

Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford University Press.

Gavrielides, T. (2007). Restorative Justice Theory and Practice: Addressing the Discrepancy. Helsinki.

Haar, B. t. (1994). Asas-Asas dan Susunan Hukum Adat (Trans. by K. N. S. Poesponoto). Pradnya Paramita.

Hadi, S. (2017). Hukum Positif dan The Living Law (Eksistensi dan Keberlakuannya dalam Masyarakat). DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(26), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.1588

Hasrina, S., Karim, S., & Mirzana, H. A. (2021). Konsep Kepentingan Umum dalam Asas Oportunitas pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 3(1), 33-39. Retrieved from https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoCL/article/view/1061

Herniti, E. (2012). Kepercayaan Masyarakat Jawa Terhadap Santet, Wangsit, dan Roh Menurut Edward-Pritchard. Thaqafiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa, Peradaban dan Informasi Islam, 13(2), 384-400. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/adab/thaqafiyyat/article/view/77

Janah, A. N., Hariandja, T. R., & Setiawan, S. A. (2023). Penerapan Hukum Jipen/Singer dalam Tindak Pidana Asusila Masyarakat Suku Dayak Ngaju (Study Kasus di Desa Pundu, Cempaga Hulu, Kotawaringin Timur, Kalimantan Tengah). Welfare State: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v2i2.2415

Karjono, A., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), 1035-1050. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9571

Kholdaa, M. C., & Pujiyono, P. (2024). Social Work Crime as an Alternative to Resolving Overcrowding in Correctional Institutions. Justisi, 10(3), 806-816. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.3491

Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss1.art14

Laia, F. F. D. (2024). Penyelesaian di Luar Pengadilan terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan Kerugian Negara yang Kecil dalam Perspektif Ius Constituendum [Dissertation, Universitas Jambi]. Repository Unja. https://repository.unja.ac.id/62069

Laia, F. F. D. (2024). The Urgency of Enacting Government Regulation on Community Service Sentence in Indonesian under the New Penal Code. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i1.350

Lasmadi, S. (2011). Mediasi Penal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Inovatif, 4(5), 1-10. Retrieved from https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/jimih/article/view/530

Laturette, A. I. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan. Sasi, 27(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.504

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/814

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1357

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Provisions of Agrarian Principles (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 104, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2043). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1361

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/755

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009 on the Judicial Power (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 157, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5076). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/585

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Making (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2011 Number 82, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5234). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/249

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2019 on Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Making (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2019 Number 183, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6398). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1749

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Making (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2022 Number 143, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6801). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1801

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1818

Lestari, R. A., Rivanie, S. S., & Soewondo, S. S. (2023). Implementation of Restorative Justice for Narcotic Abusers: A Case Study in the Takalar Public Attorney’s Office. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.275

Mahendra, A. P. (2020). Mediasi Penal Pada Tahap Penyidikan Berlandaskan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1153-1178. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i4.20200

Mahmud, Y., Akili, R. H. S., Kadir, Y., & Moonti, R. M. (2019). Restorative Justice dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor: 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto Atas Kasus Persetubuhan terhadap Anak. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.37

Marshall, C. D. (2020). Restorative Justice. In P. Babie & R. Sarre (Eds.), Religion Matters: The Contemporary Relevance of Religion (pp. 101-117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2489-9_7

Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

Musleh, M., Rosyidah, A. R. N., Faruq, U., & Saedi, M. (2023). Urgensi Asas Ketuhanan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, 3(2), 176-198. https://doi.org/10.15642/sosyus.v3i2.362

Nugraha, S. (2021). Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penegakan Hukum bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ilmu Hitam pada Masyarakat Dayak Ngaju. Belom Bahadat: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, 11(1), 25-37. https://mail.ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/belom-bahadat/article/view/629

Pongoh, R. R., Lembong, J., & Rompis, T. (2020). Persoalan Prapenuntutan dalam Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP. Lex Crimen, 9(3), 180-187. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/29851

Prasetya, M. D., Sari, I. P., Said, S., & Akbar, A. (2023). Forms and Developments of Narcotics Crime during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.164

Pratiwi, P. F. P., & Pratama, A. (2023). Sanksi Adat bagi Panyapa dalam Hukum Adat Dayak Ngaju. Belom Bahadat: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, 13(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.33363/bb.v13i2.1056

Pratiwi, P. F. P., Suprayitno, S., & Triyani, T. (2019). Upaya Hukum untuk Menjerat Tindakan Perebut Laki Orang (Pelakor) dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat Dayak Ngaju di Kalimantan Tengah. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-3: Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Kawasan Perbatasan (pp. 173-188). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Borneo Tarakan. Retrieved from http://prosiding.ubt.ac.id/index.php/snhpb/article/view/27

Prayitno, K. P. (2012). Restorative Justice untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116

Prayogo, S. B., Asyahadi, F., & Abas, M. (2024). Optimizing Social Work and Restorative Justice in Overcoming Overcrowded Correctional Institutions. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(3), 383-389. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.364

Prodjodikoro, W. (2009). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Regulation of the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 on the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice (Bulletin Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2020 Number 811). https://peraturan.go.id/id/peraturan-kejakgung-no-15-tahun-2020

Regulation of the Province of Central Kalimantan Number 16 of 2008 on the Dayak Indigenous Institutions in Central Kalimantan (Provincial Gazette of Central Kalimantan of 2008 Number 16. Supplement to the Provincial Gazette of Central Kalimantan Number 24). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/89276/perda-prov-kalimantan-tengah-no-16-tahun-2008

Rezah, F. S., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2021). Custom as a Critical Concept and Siri’ as the Core Concept of Ugi-Mangkasara Culture. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.123

Rivanie, S. S., Soewondo, S. S., Azisa, N., Abadi, M. T., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Application of Imprisonment to Kleptomaniacs: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169

Rosadi, O., & Satria, A. (2022). Implikasi Yuridis Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Tersangka Tindak Pidana. Unes Law Review, 5(1), 99-109. Retrieved from https://review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/294

Rumadan, I. (2021). Interpretation of the Legal Values and Justice in the Living Law Related to Court Decision. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 4(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.4.1.2946.13-22

Sarwirini, S. (2014). Implementasi Restorative Justice dalam Penegakan Hukum Pajak. Yuridika, 29(3), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i3.378

Savigny, F. C. v. (1831). Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence (Trans. by A. Hayward). Littlewood and Company.

Sihombing, D. C., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Penguatan Kewenangan Jaksa Selaku Dominus Litis Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berorientasi Keadilan Restoratif. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i2.42

Soekanto, S., & Sulistyowati, B. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soepomo, S. (1993). Bab-Bab tentang Hukum Adat. PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Tresna, L. P., Amiruddin, A., & Ufran, U. (2022). Implementation of the Principle of Dominus Litis in Positive Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5(11), 3123-3131. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i11-20

United Nations. (1999, 15 December). Tenth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Vienna, 10-17 April 2000 (A/CONF.187/8). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/432651/files/A_CONF.187_8-EN.pdf?ln=en

Wibowo, A. F., Sadam, A. V., & Ramadavin, M. (2023). Implikasi Pasal Living Law dalam Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Terbaru Terhadap Kehidupan Masyarakat. Selisik: Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis, 9(1), 120-127. Retrieved from https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/selisik/article/view/5222

Wulandari, C., Pujirahayu, E. W., Hiariej, E. O. S., Hassan, M. S., & Kambuno, J. A. (2022). Penal Mediation: Criminal Case Settlement Process based on the Local Customary Wisdom of Dayak Ngaju. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.54896

Published
2024-12-03
How to Cite
Laia, F. F. D. (2024). Restorative Justice and Living Law Based on Dayak Ngaju Adat Law: A Comprehensive Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.363