Judicial Review of Pretrial Rulings: A Critical Analysis of Their Authority and Influence
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal authority related to filing for Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings and its implications for the enforcement of justice in Indonesia. The study employs a normative legal research method with a statute approach. The collected legal materials are then analyzed qualitatively to describe the issues and address the research objectives. The research findings indicate that the authority to file for Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings is a complex legal issue. Although Law Number 8 of 1981 does not explicitly provide for it, there are legal grounds that allow for such Judicial Review to be pursued. Suspects, Legal Advisor, and Prosecutors are the legal subjects authorized to file for Judicial Review. However, implementing Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings still faces several challenges, particularly concerning public understanding and accessibility to the justice system. The Decision of Judicial Review on Pretrial Rulings has broad implications, not only affecting the fate of the individuals involved in the case but also contributing significantly to the protection of human rights, legal certainty, and improving the quality of law enforcement in Indonesia. The Supreme Court has a crucial role in providing clear and comprehensive guidelines regarding the technical implementation of Judicial Review against Pretrial Rulings, whether through the issuance of jurisprudence, a Circular of the Supreme Court, or reform of criminal procedural law. Reforming the procedure for filing for Judicial Review, which includes simplifying the procedure, intensifying public awareness campaigns, and optimizing the role of legal aid institutions, becomes crucial in enhancing access to justice and the protection of human rights.
Downloads
References
Alamsyah, F. R., Cameron, C., Ridwan, P., Yustisia, M. T., Romadhon, M. R. R., & Yusuf, N. T. (2023). Problems in the Application of Law in the Indra Kenz Fraudulent Investment Case. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v4i1.67847
Arifin, F. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Indonesian Democracy: A Perspective on the Sovereignty of Law and the Distribution of Power. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.353
Asnatuti, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2019). Peran Penasehat Hukum dalam Membantu Tersangka pada Penyidikan Guna Terciptanya Proses Hukum yang Adil. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 66-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v10i1.157
Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90
Fitrah, F. A., Takariawan, A., & Muttaqin, Z. (2021). The Position of Civil Servant Investigator of Directorate General of Tax (DGT) in the Frame of Taxation Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.107
Hellqvist, S. (2021). Access to Justice for Wrongful Conviction Claimants in Sweden: The Final Legal Safeguard and Levels of (In)accessibility. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39(3), 320-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2021.2010909
Irmawaty, I., & Burhany, M. (2022). The Principle of Listening to Both Sides in the Sinjai District Court: A Case Study of Court Decision. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2.366
Karindra, A. B. (2024). Pretrial Efforts to Realize Legal Provisions that Are Proportional and Do Not Contract the Perspective Pancasila Law. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5516
Kelsen, H. (1960). The Pure Theory of Law (Trans. by M. Knight). University of California Press.
Kokoszkiewicz, A., & Tokarski, T. (2024). Dilemmas of Justice in Law – the Historical-Legal and Semantic Aspects of Justice. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie, 17(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.8535
Laia, F. F. D. (2024). The Urgency of Enacting Government Regulation on Community Service Sentence in Indonesian under the New Penal Code. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i1.350
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/755
Martono, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penangkapan dan Penahanan Tersangka dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i1.39
Muryawan, A. G., Mashdurohatun, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2023). Legal Reconstruction of Pretrial Procedure on the Rights of the Applicant or the Applicant Associated with Justice Value-Based Remedy. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 132, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/132-06
Musyarri, F. A., & Sabrina, G. (2023). Pembatasan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(3), 293-309. Retrieved from https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/585
Njoo, C. I. H., Dharmayanti, D., & Sari, S. W. (2020). Prevention of Criminal Prosecution Resulted from Breach of Contract. In H. D. Mulyaningsih (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World 2019 (pp. 276-286). SciTePress Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008430302760286
Oktana, R., Akub, S., & Maskun, M. (2023). Social Media in the Process of Evidence of Electronic Information and Transaction Crimes. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.252
Pavone, T., & Stiansen, Ø. (2022). The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873
Pech, L. (2022). The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(2), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
Peirone, F. (2024). All in Good Time: Temporal Forms of Public Law Decisions. Transnational Legal Theory, 15(2), 260-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2024.2364450
Prasetya, M. D., Sari, I. P., Said, S., & Akbar, A. (2023). Forms and Developments of Narcotics Crime during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.164
Putri, L. (2023). Effectiveness and Study of the Criminal Law Pretrial System. Enigma in Law, 1(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i1.15
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Memahami Hukum: Dari Konstruksi sampai Implementasi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rivanie, S. S., Soewondo, S. S., Azisa, N., Abadi, M. T., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Application of Imprisonment to Kleptomaniacs: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Situmeang, S. M. T. (2021). Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law. Law Reform, 17(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41746
Stoykova, R. (2023). The Right to a Fair Trial as a Conceptual Framework for Digital Evidence Rules in Criminal Investigations. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801
Yunara, E., & Kemas, T. (2024). The Role of Victimology in the Protection of Crime Victims in Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 3(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v3i01.15379
Copyright (c) 2024 Sahat Simamora, Zainal Abidin Pakpahan, Toni Toni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
