Legal Consequences of Violating the Obligations of Prospective Intern Notary: A Study of Legislation

  • Fitria Rosalinda Universitas Diponegoro
  • Aminah Aminah Universitas Diponegoro

Abstract

This study examines and analyzes the legal consequences of violations of obligations committed by prospective intern Notaries based on Law Number 30 of 2004 and Law Number 2 of 2014. This study uses normative legal research with the statute and conceptual approaches. The collected legal material is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer study purposes. The results show that the Article 16A of Law Number 2 of 2014 prescriptively indicates that prospective intern Notaries have attributive authority in doing authentic deeds. On the other hand, it reveals no additional articles providing sanctions if a prospective intern Notary violates this Article 16A of Law Number 2 of 2014. Despite these conditions, prospective intern Notaries ignoring their obligations are not exempt from legal consequences under Article 444 section (1) of Law Number 1 of 2023, Article 1365 of the Civil Code, and Article 12 point 3 of INI Regulation Number 19/PERKUM/INI/2019. Therefore, it is recommended that all stakeholders, including prospective intern Notary and Notary accepting intern, strictly adhere to the legal and regulatory framework governing internships. Further, the House of Representatives could consider for Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004. In this case, legislation formation must provide more explicit provisions on the limitations and responsibilities of prospective intern Notaries and the consequences of violations. Clarifying these aspects could prevent misunderstandings, enhance the effectiveness of the internship program, and ultimately improve the overall quality and integrity of the Notary profession.

Keywords: Authentic Deed, Code of Ethics, Legal Consequence, Prospective Notary Intern, Violation of Obligations

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945

Ayudiatri, S., & Cahyono, A. B. (2022). The Legality of Grants by Foreign Citizens on Land Objects in Indonesia: Case Studies of Court Decisions. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.131

Budify, A., Manurung, J. A. L., & Harianja, S. B. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Hibah di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.77

Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail

Dewi, M. M. Y., & Permana, B. I. (2022). Keabsahan Akta yang Dibuat oleh Calon Notaris yang Sedang Magang di Kantor Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 3(2), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i2.36437

Dewi, N. L. P. S. P., Atmadja, I. D. G., & Yusa, I. G. (2019). Hak Ingkar Notaris sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hukum. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i01.p11

Firmansyah, F. A., & Adjie, H. (2018). Keabsahan Ujian Pengangkatan Notaris sebagai Syarat Pengangkatan Notaris. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 4(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v4i2.15440

García, B. R. (2018). Ubi Societas, Ibi Ius? Sobre el Lugar del Derecho en las Teorías Clásicas del Patrón Cultural Universal. Revista del Posgrado en Derecho de la UNAM, 1(9), 171-213. https://doi.org/10.22201/fder.26831783e.2018.9.6

Indonesian Notary Association. (2015). Code of Ethics for the Notary Public (As Amended 29-30 May 2015). https://ini.id/kode-etik

Kelsen, H. (2018). Teori Hukum Murni: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif (Trans. by R. Muttaqien). Nusamedia & Nuansa.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary Public (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 117, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4432). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/31

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 on the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary Public (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 3, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5491). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/927

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 on the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2023 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6842). https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/1818

Notoatmodjo, S. (2010). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Prabowo, T. S., & Mulyoto, M. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Calon Notaris yang Sedang Magang terhadap Kerahasiaan Akta. Jurnal Repertorium, 4(2), 70-78.

Prakoso, M. T. M., & Sukirno, S. (2023). Notary Ethics and Profession: The Consequences of Sanctions for Violating the Code of Ethics. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.266

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rakia, A. S. R. S. (2021). Perkembangan dan Urgensi Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Pasca Penetapan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.106

Ramadhan, A. F., & Permadi, I. (2019). Makna Alasan-Alasan Tertentu dalam Kode Etik Notrais Terkait Kewajiban Menjalankan Jabatan Notaris di Kantornya. Jurnal Karinov, 4(1), 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i1p15-28

Regulation of the Indonesian Notary Association Number 19/PERKUM/INI/2019 on Internship. https://ini.id/uploads/images/Perkum_no__19__MAGANG_pdf_750x_5f1d0f6d5362a.pdf

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Suwardiyati, R., & Rustam, R. (2022). Urgensi Reformulasi Pengaturan Penyerahan Protokol Notaris untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i2.40

Yudha, I. B. N. K., & Putra, I. B. W. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Calon Notaris yang Magang Tidak Sebagaimana Mestinya. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 206-221.

Zenkner, A. C., & Silva, J. B. (2018). Access to Justice for the Profilatic Activity of the Notary: Extrajudicial Mediation as an Alternative Means of Conflict Solution. Scientia Iuris, 22(3), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n3p88

Zulfan, M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Calon Notaris yang Magang di Kantor Notaris yang Tidak Direkomendasikan oleh Pengurus Wilayah Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Officium Notarium, 1(3), 536-542. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss3.art14

Published
2023-06-12
How to Cite
Rosalinda, F., & Aminah, A. (2023). Legal Consequences of Violating the Obligations of Prospective Intern Notary: A Study of Legislation. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i1.269