Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime

  • A. Melantik Rompegading Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Abstract

This study examines the principles that can deter and eradicate gratification as part of the corruption crime. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The data was collected using literature study techniques on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods, which will conclude the research's object. The results show that the deterrence and eradication of gratification crime have been regulated in Article 12 B and Article 12 C of Law No. 20 of 2001. In addition, this provision contains an encumbrance of reverse proof, which aims to simplify the process of proving illegal receipts and indications as a bribery crime for civil servants or state administrators. The principles in deterrence and eradication of gratification crime include legal certainty, transparency, accountability, public interest, proportionality, and respect for human rights. Therefore, it is recommended to CEC, civil servants or state administrators, and the community to practice the principles of deterrence and eradication of gratification crime. In this case, Indonesia can be released from the shackles of criminal acts of corruption in the future.

Keywords: Corruption, Deterrence and Eradication, Gratification, Principle

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Administrator. (2021, 5 October). Gratifikasi dan Suap, Apa sih Bedanya? Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/berita/gratifikasi-dan-suap-apa-sih-bedanya, at the date of 22 December 2021.

Bunga, M., et al. (2019). Urgensi Peran serta Masyarakat dalam Upaya Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform, 15(1), 85-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356

Dharmawan, N. A. S. (2018). Etika, Agama, dan Cinta sebagai Modal Dasar Akuntan dalam Memberantas Korupsi. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 3(1), 17-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v3i1.16626

Diantha, I. M. P. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Fitrah, F. A., et al. (2021). The Position of Civil Servant Investigator of Directorate General of Tax (DGT) in the Frame of Taxation Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.107

Government Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2015 on Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2015 Number 31, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5661).

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2018 on Procedures for Implementing Community Participation and Awarding in Deterring and Eradicating the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2018 Number 157, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6250).

Hardjaloka, L. (2014). Studi Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia dan Negara Lainnya sebagai Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Sektor Publik. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(3), 435-452. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.35

Harefa, N. S. K., et al. (2020). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 30-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68

Istiqomah, M. (2016). Kebijakan Formulasi Pengaturan “Illicit Enrichment” sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Media Hukum, 23(1), 76-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0069.76-86

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 1999 on the State Organizer who shall be Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 75, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3851).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 140, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3886).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 134, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 137, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4250).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2014 on the State Civil Apparatus (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 6, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5494).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2015 on Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2015 on Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission Into Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2015 Number 107, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5698).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2019 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2019 Number 197, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6409).

Mapuasari, S. A. & Mahmudah, H. (2018). Korupsi Berjamaah: Konsensus Sosial atas Gratifikasi dan Suap. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 4(2), 159-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.279

Mubayyinah, F. (2017). SEMAI: Sembilan Nilai Anti Korupsi dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Al-Hikmah: Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Islamic Education, 1(2), 223-238. doi: https://doi.org/10.35896/ijecie.v1i2.15

Nazifah, L. (2019). Strategi Menyikapi Gratifikasi dengan Identifikasi Pemberian Hadiah Kepada Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Monas: Jurnal Inovasi Aparatur, 1(2), 47-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.54849/monas.v1i2.9

Qamar, N. & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. Makassar: CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Setiyowati, L. & Ispriyarso, B. (2019). Upaya Preventif dalam Rangka Pengawasan terhadap APBD Melalui Penjaringan Aspirasi Masyarakat oleh DPRD. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 250-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.250-265

Silaban, R. & Pase, I. M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(1), 107-119. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v3i1.823

Yunas, N. S. (2020). Implementasi e-Government dalam Meminimalisasi Praktik Rent Seeking Behaviour pada Birokrasi Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 4(1), 13-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.4.1.2020.13-23

Published
2022-03-07
How to Cite
Rompegading, A. M. (2022). Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.161