Legal Protection Effort towards Mark Owner from the Share-in Jar Cosmetic Trade
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and understand the legal protection towards the mark owner from the share-in jar cosmetic trade and the legal consequences for business actors who do share-in jar cosmetic trade. The type of legal research used in this study is a normative juridical legal research method. The data collection in this study was conducted through a literature study from the laws and regulations, journals, research results, and books. The data analysis used in this research is the descriptive analysis method. The results of the study show that the legal protection towards the mark owner from the share-in jar cosmetic trade can be carried out through preventive and repressive legal protection efforts. Legal protection efforts are preventively carried out by registering the mark to get legal protection as a legal mark owner. Repressive legal protection efforts for trademarks can be done by litigation dispute resolution and non-litigation dispute resolution. The legal consequences for business actors who do share-in jar cosmetic trade are compensate for damages and/or ceasing all acts related to mark use. Therefore, it is recommended to the mark owner to provide cosmetics with trial or sample sizes. In this case, so that consumers try first about their compatibility with these cosmetics. On the other hand, business actors doing share-in cosmetic jar trade must make a license agreement with the mark owner. Furthermore, the government needs to include criteria for violations of right on mark in laws and regulations. This is purpose to increase legal protection towards the mark owner from the share-in jar cosmetic trade in the future.
Downloads
References
Administrator. (2021, 25 February). Kebijakan Barang yang Dilarang dan Dibatasi. Shopee Limited. Retrieved from
https://shopee.co.id/docs/3000, at the date of 28 April 2021.
Ardiansah, A., et al. (2019). Penyelesaian Polemik Ganti Rugi sebagai Objek Pajak Atas Putusan Arbitrase untuk Pembangunan Nasional. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, 19(1), 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v11i01.146
Arief, Moh. Zainol & Sutrisni, S. (2014). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Transaksi Jual-Beli Melalui Internet Ditinjau dari Buku III KUHPerdata. Jendela Hukum, Universitas Wiraraja, 1(2), 32-42.
Asmara, Andre, et al. (2019). Studi Kasus Penerapan Prinsip First to File pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, Universitas Syiah Kuala, 3(2), 184-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i2.11899
Colonial Regulations, Staatsblad Number 23 of 1847 on the Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie/the Civil Code.
Dewi, Chandra Gita. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaan Merek. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Hadi, I Gusti Ayu Apsari. (2018). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pertanggungjawaban Dokter terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik Medis. Jurnal Yuridis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, 5(1), 98-113. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/.v5i1.318
Hanim, Lathifah. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum HaKI dalam Perjanjian Waralaba di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 26(2), 571-589. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v26i2.210
Hariyani, Iswi, et al. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kurniawan, Shelly. (2019). Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Merek Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dengan World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Centre. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi, Universitas Kristen Maranatha, 11(1), 97-113. doi:
https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v11i1.1972
Kusen, Stevana Ameliana. (2016). Hakekat Keberadaan Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Elektronik Bagian Hukum Pidana, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 5(6), 14-22.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 138, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3872).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 252, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5953).
Mafulah, Hanim. (2020). Pengecualian Perjanjian yang Berkaitan Paten dan Lisensinya dalam Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 1(2), 87-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.55
Nashrullah, M. Faiz. (2019). Resiko dan Ganti Rugi dalam Perikatan Perspektif Konvensional dan Syariah. Journal of Islamic Business Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 3(4), 13-20.
Nola, Luthvi Febryka. (2016). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Secara Terpadu bagi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI, 7(1), 35-52.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Pradana, Mahir. (2015). Klasifikasi Bisnis E-commerce di Indonesia. Modus, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 27(2), 163-174. doi:
https://doi.org/10.24002/modus.v27i2.554
Qamar, Nurul & Rezah, Farah Syah. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. Makassar: CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Safitri, Ribath. (2020). “Akibat Hukum Penggunaan Merek Pribadi oleh Pelaku Usaha terhadap Produk Merek Dagang Terkenal Asing Melalui Repacking”. Dissertation. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sari, Novita Permata & Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede. (2019). Pengajuan Gugatan Ganti Rugi Merek Terkenal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Udayana, 8(3), 1-12.
Soerjowinoto, Petrus. (2018). Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengantar (Buku Panduan Mahasiswa). Semarang: UPT Perpustakaan Unika Soegijapranata.
Suhyana, Fina Agustina, et al. (2021). Transaksi Ilegal Menggunakan Kartu ATM Milik Orang Lain. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2(2), 138-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.92
Syarifuddin, Muhammad Setya Ady. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Perjanjian Lisensi Merek. Simbur Cahaya, Universitas Sriwijaya, 26(1), 27-41.
Theda, Almira Mey. (2020). “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Skin Care Skin1004 Atas Penjualan Produk Kemasan (Share In Jar)”. Undergraduate Thesis. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Waluyo, Bambang. (2008). Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Winastri, Rivo Krisna & Priyono, Ery Agus. (2017). Tinjauan Normatif terhadap Ganti Rugi dalam Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Immateriil (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Istimewa Jakarta No. 568/1968.G). Diponegoro Law Journal, Universitas Diponegoro, 6(2), 1-18.
Yuniarlin, Prihati. (2012). Penerapan Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan Melawan Hukum terhadap Kreditur yang Tidak Mendaftarkan Jaminan Fiducia. Jurnal Media Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 19(2), 1-11.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sheril Firdausy, Anajeng Esri Edhi Mahanani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
